BRIDGES · Structures and trusts

Nominee agreement

Nominee agreement

recordsthe parties’ real relationship
disclosurethe beneficiary must be disclosed
with cautionthe compliance attitude
  • 4 min read
  • Updated: July 2026
  • BRIDGES Research Team
In brief — 30 seconds
What it is
An agreement between the nominee and the real owner on the nature of their relationship
What it records
That the nominee acts on the instructions and in the interests of the real owner
What it does not do
It does not hide the beneficiary: they are disclosed to banks and in registers
Why it is used
Local director requirements, everyday privacy, administrative convenience
The main risk
Reviewers treat such structures with caution

In plain words

A nominee agreement is a contract between a nominee director or shareholder and the real owner that records the true nature of their relationship: the nominee holds the position formally and acts on the instructions and in the interests of the real owner. The document is usually accompanied by a waiver of rights, powers of attorney and pre-signed letters of resignation.

It is important to understand what such an agreement does not do. It does not hide the beneficial owner: when an account is opened, the bank establishes who actually controls the company, and registers of beneficial owners exist in a growing number of jurisdictions. The agreement governs the parties’ relationship with each other, not their relationship with the state.

There are lawful reasons to use nominees: some jurisdictions’ requirements for a local director, administrative convenience, everyday privacy. But in the context of compliance and due diligence such structures are treated with caution and require explanation. Where there is no real justification, direct ownership is almost always the calmer option.

Where it is encountered

A jurisdiction’s requirement for a local director
Administrative support for a company
Everyday privacy
A client’s legacy structures
Reviewing the structure before applying for a programme
Opening a company account

What the agreement contains

Parties
  • The nominee
  • The real owner
  • Nature of the relationship
Powers
  • Acting on instructions
  • The nominee’s limitations
  • Decision-making procedure
Protection
  • Waiver of rights to the assets
  • Letter of resignation
  • Powers of attorney
Reality
  • Disclosure of the beneficiary to the bank
  • Registers of beneficiaries
  • Compliance attitude

How to approach it

  1. 01Establish the real reason
  2. 02Assess whether a nominee is needed at all
  3. 03Put the agreement in writing
  4. 04Disclose the beneficiary to the bank
  5. 05Prepare an explanation for checks

What you need to know

  • The agreement governs the parties’ relationship, not their relationship with the state
  • The beneficial owner is disclosed to the bank and in registers
  • Compliance treats nominee structures with caution
  • Without a written agreement the real owner is vulnerable
  • In due diligence such a structure will have to be explained

Common mistakes

  • Using a nominee to conceal ownership
  • Operating without a written agreement
  • Not disclosing the beneficiary to the bank
  • Keeping outdated nominee structures before filing
  • Choosing a nominee without checking their reputation

What this means for a BRIDGES client

We always suggest simplifying the structure before filing: the fewer elements that require explanation, the more smoothly the check goes. Nominee structures without a real justification are the first candidates for review.

Frequently asked questions

01 /What is a nominee agreement?

A contract between a nominee director or shareholder and the real owner, recording that the nominee acts on the instructions and in the interests of the owner.

02 /Does it hide ownership?

No. The bank establishes the real beneficiary when an account is opened, and registers of beneficial owners operate in a growing number of countries.

03 /Is it lawful?

The structure itself is lawful and in some jurisdictions necessary — for example, where a local director is required. The question is the purpose for which it is used.

04 /Why is a written agreement needed?

Without it the real owner is legally vulnerable: formally the assets and powers belong to the nominee.

05 /How does compliance view it?

With caution. Such structures require explanation, and without a clear justification they complicate both banking procedures and due diligence.

06 /What should be done with an old nominee structure?

Review it before applying for the programme: either justify it with documents or simplify it to direct ownership.

See also

Read next

Klara Rihter
AuthorKlara RihterHead of Compliance and Due Diligence, BRIDGES
Sergey Evdokimov
Reviewed bySergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGES
Updated
July 2026
Version
1.0
Scheduled review
January 2027
Back to glossary

Are there nominees in your structure?

We will work out what can be simplified before filing and what needs to be explained with documents.

Message us on WhatsApp →