Updated: June 2026

Case study · Malta · Tax

How an Adopted Child Was Included in Malta Citizenshipby Merit Through Legalization of Soviet Documents

In family matters, the most vulnerable aspect is documentation executed long ago in a country that no longer exists. Inna wanted to include her adopted child in an application for Malta citizenship by merit, but the adoption papers were executed under the laws of a state that no longer exists, and the Maltese authorities questioned their legitimacy. There was a risk that the child would be excluded and the family divided by status. We explain how we legalized a chain of Soviet documents and prevented this from happening.

Anna KovalevskayaAnna KovalevskayaHead of Legal, BRIDGESReading time9 min readVerificationReviewed by an expert

This case is based on a real matter. The name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

BRIDGES client story - How an Adopted Child Was Included in Malta Citizenship by Merit Through Legalization of Soviet Documents
Contents

Case at a glance

Situation, solution and outcome in seven lines

Client
Inna, approximately 40 years old, with an adopted child
Composition
Mother and adopted child
Program
Malta, citizenship by merit (naturalization)
Problem
Adoption documents issued under the laws of a non-existent country
Risk
Exclusion of child from case, family division
Solution
Apostille and judicial confirmation of the document chain
Outcome
Child included, family obtained status together

Client story

Client's Story

Where they started

For Inna, the adopted child is simply her child, without any qualifications. They spent years together, and when the question of Malta citizenship by merit arose, there was no debate: status would be formalized for the entire family or not at all.

Why the standard route did not work

The complexity emerged during the document verification stage. The adoption was formalized many years ago, under the laws of a country that no longer exists on the map. Seals, forms, procedures—everything was from that era. For the Maltese authorities, such documents looked questionable: how could one be certain that the document was authentic and legally valid if the state that issued it no longer existed?

What BRIDGES had to solve

A real risk emerged that the adopted child would simply be excluded from the application as a person with unconfirmed kinship. This would mean the worst—the family would be divided by status: mother with citizenship, child without it.

Why a standard answer would not do

Inna contacted BRIDGES when she realized that the issue was not with the adoption itself, which was real and had occurred long ago, but rather in proving it documentarily in the language of modern law—in such a way that the Maltese authority would have no doubts.

For me, this was never "adopted"—this is my child, period. When they said they might not include him because of old papers, the ground disappeared from under my feet. Anna and her team assembled the entire chain of documents so thoroughly that there were no questions left, and we obtained status together.

Inna, 40 · Inna, MotherThe name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

What Was at Risk

What Was at Risk

Documents from disappeared states are a classic trap in family matters. The event itself—adoption—is real and lawful, but the chain of its confirmation breaks off where the previous jurisdiction ended. A modern authority cannot simply take it on faith; it needs a legally constructed connection.

Exclusion of the adopted child from the application as a person with unconfirmed kinship;

  1. 01Family division by status: citizenship for the mother, denial for the child;
  2. 02Non-recognition of documents issued under the laws of a non-existent country;
  3. 03Prolongation or suspension of the entire family case due to a single link;
  4. 04The necessity to prove the obvious—the reality of the long-ago adoption—without a clear mechanism.

The logic of the solution

How the matter progressed: from checks to result

The chart is built from the facts of this matter and shows the logic of the work without decorative or unverified data.

  1. 01
    Stage 1

    Examined the original adoption documents and determined which current authority is the legal successor to the former archives.

  2. 02
    Stage 2

    Located archival records and obtained official extracts confirming the adoption act itself.

  3. 03
    Stage 3

    Obtained apostille certification for the documents through the authorized body, granting them international legal force.

  4. 04
    Stage 4

    Secured judicial confirmation of the adoption fact—to establish it as an indisputable legal fact, not a matter of interpretation.

  5. 05
    Stage 5

    Prepared certified translations and assembled the complete documentation chain for the Maltese authorities.

Takeaway. For Inna, the most important outcome was not the passport itself, but that the family remained unified in status—without division into "citizen" and "unrecognized." The documents are now in proper order once and for all and will be useful in any future proceedings.

How We Resolved the Issue

How We Resolved the Issue

The work was split into verifiable stages so that every conclusion rested on documents.

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    Examined the original adoption documents and determined which current authority is the legal successor to the former archives.

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    Located archival records and obtained official extracts confirming the adoption act itself.

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    Obtained apostille certification for the documents through the authorized body, granting them international legal force.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    Secured judicial confirmation of the adoption fact—to establish it as an indisputable legal fact, not a matter of interpretation.

  5. 05

    Stage 5

    Prepared certified translations and assembled the complete documentation chain for the Maltese authorities.

  6. 06

    Stage 6

    Included the child in the family application and supported the review process, eliminating all questions regarding the legitimacy of kinship.

Expert comment

I appreciate family law matters precisely for moments like these, where at first glance "nothing will work." The adoption is real, the child is our own—yet formally the documents are from a country that no longer exists. Our role is not to persuade the authority, but to construct a legal chain that cannot be disputed: archive, apostille, court. Once the adoption fact is confirmed by court decision, the matter is closed. For Inna, this meant the family moved forward together, rather than being divided by status.

Anna Kovalevskaya, Head of Legal, BRIDGESAnna KovalevskayaHead of Legal, BRIDGES

Outcome

What the client received

Indicator
Before · After
Adoption Documents
questionable to Malta · legalized (archive+apostille+court)
Child's Status
risk of exclusion · included in the case
Family
risk of division by status · status obtained together
Future Authorities
problem · chain established permanently
Future Authorities
problem · chain established permanently

The adopted child was included in the application, and the family obtained status together. The chain of Soviet documents was fully legalized: archival extracts, apostille, and judicial confirmation dispelled all Maltese authority doubts regarding the legitimacy of the adoption.

Practical takeaway

What matters in a similar situation

  • For Inna, the most important outcome was not the passport itself, but that the family remained unified in status—without division into "citizen" and "unrecognized." The documents are now in proper order once and for all and will be useful in any future proceedings.
  • This case demonstrates that in family matters, success is determined not by emotions, but by evidential proof. A genuine adoption that occurred long ago can be lost due to a documentation gap—but it can be upheld by constructing an unbroken legal chain to the fact.

FAQ

Questions people ask in a similar situation

01Can an adopted child be included in citizenship by merit?

Yes, with confirmed kinship. Difficulties arise when adoption documents were executed long ago or under the laws of a non-existent state—then legalization of the documentation chain is required.

02What to do with documents from a defunct state?

Establish a legal chain of evidence: archival documents from the successor state, apostille certification, and where necessary, judicial confirmation of fact. This transforms the old document into indisputable evidence.

03Why is judicial confirmation necessary?

A court judgment establishes the adoption as a legal fact that the authority is obliged to accept, eliminating any interpretation issues regarding outdated documents.

04Can a family obtain status in parts?

Our goal is to process the entire family through a single application. We structure evidence to ensure no one is excluded and the family is not separated by immigration status.

05How long does document legalization take?

It depends on the successor state and its archives. We conduct this process in parallel with the main application to avoid extending the overall timeline.

06Need to include a child or relative but documents are outdated or from a defunct country?

We will verify your family's document chain, legalize it through archives, apostille certification and court proceedings, and process your entire family under a single Malta citizenship by merit application.

About the author

Anna Kovalevskaya

Author: Anna Kovalevskaya

Head of Legal, BRIDGES

I have worked with citizenship and residency matters in European countries for 12 years. Programme requirements and application practices change, so I assess each matter against the current rules, the applicant's immigration history, family composition and the documents supporting the legal basis for the application.

I lead matters from the preliminary assessment through to the grant of status. In complex situations, I identify the circumstances that may affect the review, establish the legal logic of the application and oversee the consistency of the supporting documents at every stage.

During the consultation, you will receive an assessment of the available legal grounds, a clear understanding of the chosen route and a list of issues that should be resolved before filing. Once the engagement begins, I oversee the application and the key decisions of the BRIDGES team.

Prepared on the basis of BRIDGES practice and reviewed by a subject-matter expert.

Discuss your situation with Anna

We will review your situation and propose a solution

Describe your task in a few words. We will study your situation, assess the legal and practical options and propose the next step based on your goals, documents and country.

Confidential · no obligations · answered by the relevant specialist

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Dmitry NagyInternational Tax Consultant, BRIDGES
Dmitry Nagy, International Tax Consultant, BRIDGES

Names and certain details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. The result described reflects one specific situation and is neither a public offer nor a guarantee of a similar outcome. Programme terms are stated as of 2026 and may change - please confirm current parameters with a BRIDGES consultant.