Updated: June 2026

Case study · Egypt · Citizenship

How a client obtained Egyptian citizenshipafter failing the Malta program

A Maltese EU passport is a coveted goal, but the path to it is expensive, lengthy, and not accessible to everyone—and hitting a dead end there is especially frustrating. Our client failed to qualify for the Malta program and had already lost hope of obtaining a second passport altogether. We proposed a different approach: not an EU passport at any cost, but a practical second passport—Egypt. Here's how we preserved the goal itself.

Sergey EvdokimovSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGESReading time9 min readVerificationReviewed by an expert

This case is based on a real matter. The name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

BRIDGES client story - How a client obtained Egyptian citizenship after failing the Malta program
Contents

Case at a glance

Situation, solution and outcome in seven lines

Client
Investor who did not qualify for Malta
Objective
Second passport after Malta failure
Program
Egypt, citizenship by investment (Egyptian Citizenship by Investment)
Challenge
Malta pathway did not work; time and funds were lost
Solution
Pivot to Egyptian citizenship by investment
Rationale
Practical second passport instead of unattainable EU citizenship
Outcome
Egyptian citizenship obtained

Client story

Client's story

Where they started

The client initially set his sights on the most prestigious option—a Maltese EU passport. The goal was understandable, but the path proved to be a dead end for him: the Malta program is expensive, lengthy, involves rigorous vetting, and has recently faced serious structural uncertainty. For these combined reasons, his Malta project did not materialize.

Why the standard route did not work

He came to us discouraged: he had invested time, effort, and resources—and received no results. Worse, he had begun to believe that if Malta didn't work out, a second passport was not meant for him at all, that he was fundamentally "ineligible."

What BRIDGES had to solve

Here it was crucial to make the correct diagnosis. The problem was not that the client could not obtain second citizenship, but that he was aiming for the most expensive and complex option. A Maltese EU passport is not the only second passport available. There are accessible and practical programs, and one of them is Egyptian citizenship by investment: significantly cheaper, simpler in structure, with clear options such as non-refundable contributions.

Why a standard answer would not do

The client came to BRIDGES essentially to preserve the goal itself: instead of struggling toward an unattainable Maltese passport, to obtain a practical second passport where it was genuinely feasible—and Egypt offered that opportunity.

I pursued the Maltese EU passport and hit a wall: expensive, lengthy, and unclear about the program itself. In the end, nothing worked out, and I decided that I couldn't obtain a second passport at all. Sergey explained that the issue was not with me, but with the fact that I was aiming for the most difficult option. He proposed Egypt—significantly cheaper and simpler. We pivoted, processed the application, and I now have my second passport in hand. Sometimes a bird in the hand is better than an unattainable crane.

Alexander · InvestorThe name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

What was at risk

What was at risk

The real risk lay in drawing the wrong conclusion from the setback: deciding that a second passport was unattainable altogether and giving up—or repeatedly battling an insurmountable Malta program. The threat was not to the goal of "second passport" itself, but to becoming fixated on its most expensive and complex version. The solution was to pivot to an accessible and practical program.

That failure with Malta was a dead end on one route, not the impossibility of obtaining a second passport;

  1. 01That a Maltese EU passport is the most expensive and complex option;
  2. 02That accessible practical programs for second citizenship exist;
  3. 03That Egyptian citizenship is simpler in structure and significantly cheaper;
  4. 04Choosing a realistically achievable path instead of an unattainable one.

The logic of the solution

How the matter progressed: from checks to result

The chart is built from the facts of this matter and shows the logic of the work without decorative or unverified data.

  1. 01
    Stage 1

    We established the correct diagnosis. First, we separated the objective from its most complex version: the client's access to a second passport was possible; what proved unattainable was specifically the Malta option. This restored his perspective instead of concluding "I am not eligible."

  2. 02
    Stage 2

    We eliminated the sense of hopelessness. We demonstrated to the client that failure with Malta does not render him "ineligible": he was aiming for the most expensive and complex option, and failure there does not signify failure everywhere. This shifted his mindset toward finding a workable solution.

  3. 03
    Stage 3

    We identified an accessible program - Egypt. We proposed Egyptian citizenship through investment: significantly cheaper than Malta, simpler in structure, with clear options - for example, non-refundable contribution without withholding. The objective of "second passport" became achievable.

  4. 04
    Stage 4

    We selected the appropriate investment option. We tailored a specific Egyptian program option to the client's situation and structured the application process to proceed without encountering Malta's complexities.

  5. 05
    Stage 5

    We completed the procedure through to citizenship. We processed the investment and completed the Egyptian program procedure. After the expensive dead end, the client progressed along a clear and accessible route.

Takeaway. Conclusion: Failure with Malta represents a dead end of the most expensive route, not unattainability of a second passport. The functional solution is to pivot to an accessible program; Egypt is significantly cheaper and simpler.

How we resolved the matter

How we resolved the matter

The work was split into verifiable stages so that every conclusion rested on documents.

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    We established the correct diagnosis. First, we separated the objective from its most complex version: the client's access to a second passport was possible; what proved unattainable was specifically the Malta option. This restored his perspective instead of concluding "I am not eligible."

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    We eliminated the sense of hopelessness. We demonstrated to the client that failure with Malta does not render him "ineligible": he was aiming for the most expensive and complex option, and failure there does not signify failure everywhere. This shifted his mindset toward finding a workable solution.

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    We identified an accessible program - Egypt. We proposed Egyptian citizenship through investment: significantly cheaper than Malta, simpler in structure, with clear options - for example, non-refundable contribution without withholding. The objective of "second passport" became achievable.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    We selected the appropriate investment option. We tailored a specific Egyptian program option to the client's situation and structured the application process to proceed without encountering Malta's complexities.

  5. 05

    Stage 5

    We completed the procedure through to citizenship. We processed the investment and completed the Egyptian program procedure. After the expensive dead end, the client progressed along a clear and accessible route.

  6. 06

    Stage 6

    We obtained the second passport. The client obtained Egyptian citizenship - a functional second passport where it was realistically attainable. The objective he believed was lost to Malta's failure was achieved through an alternative path.

Expert comment

Malta represents the pinnacle of prestige - an EU passport - and I understand why clients target it. However, the path is expensive, lengthy, with rigorous due diligence, and recently with significant uncertainty in the program itself. When it doesn't work out, the client arrives devastated: they invested and received nothing, and moreover concluded that obtaining a second passport is now impossible. The first thing I do is establish the correct diagnosis. The issue is not that the client is ineligible, but that he was aiming for the most complex and expensive point on the map. A second passport is accessible to him - simply not a Malta one. I proposed Egypt: significantly cheaper, simpler in structure, with a clear contribution requirement. We reoriented, processed the application, and he obtained his passport. I always say: do not confuse failure of the most complex route with unattainability of the objective. If an EU passport is not achievable, secure a functional second passport where it is realistic.

Sergey Evdokimov, Managing Partner, BRIDGESSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGES

Outcome

What the client received

Requirements
How we accomplished it · Result
Understand Malta failure
diagnosis: route dead end, not objective dead end · perspective restored
Eliminate hopelessness
Malta - the most complex option · client is not "ineligible"
Find a workable solution
accessible Egypt program · second passport is achievable
Obtain citizenship
investment through program · Egyptian passport
Obtain citizenship
investment through program · Egyptian passport

Initial situation: the client was unsuccessful with the expensive and complex Malta program, lost time and funds, and concluded that a second passport was unattainable. Actions taken: established correct diagnosis; eliminated sense of hopelessness; identified accessible program - Egypt; selected appropriate investment option; completed procedure through citizenship; obtained second passport. Client result: Egyptian citizenship - a functional second passport.

Practical takeaway

What matters in a similar situation

  • Conclusion: Failure with Malta represents a dead end of the most expensive route, not unattainability of a second passport. The functional solution is to pivot to an accessible program; Egypt is significantly cheaper and simpler.
  • The client obtained the second passport he believed was lost to Malta's failure - because we redirected him from the unrealistic Malta-based objective version to Egypt's accessible and functional program.

FAQ

Questions people ask in a similar situation

01What should one do if unsuccessful with the Malta program?

Separate the objective from its most complex version. Failure with Malta is a dead end of an expensive route, not unattainability of a second passport. It is sensible to pivot to an accessible functional program.

02Why is Egypt simpler than the Malta program?

Egyptian citizenship by investment is significantly more affordable, simpler in structure, and offers clear options—for example, a non-refundable contribution without withholding. It is a functional second passport without Maltese complexities.

03Does a Malta refusal mean I am "ineligible"?

No. More often it means you aimed for the most expensive and complex option. A second passport can be entirely accessible through a different, simpler program.

04Does an Egyptian passport provide the same rights as a Maltese one?

No, Egypt is not in the EU, and the rights framework differs. However, as a functional second passport, it addresses many mobility and contingency planning needs where the Maltese route did not succeed.

05What investment options are available in Egypt?

Non-refundable contribution, real estate purchase, business investment, or refundable bank deposit. Specific amounts and conditions are confirmed with the authorized body.

06Did the Maltese program not work out and do you think a passport is unattainable?

We will provide an accurate assessment and redirect you to an accessible working program: we will select an Egyptian citizenship by investment option and deliver your second passport without Maltese complications.

About the author

Sergey Evdokimov

Author: Sergey Evdokimov

Managing Partner, BRIDGES

As Founder and Managing Partner of BRIDGES, I am responsible for the firm's strategy and personally lead its most complex client matters, including cases in which citizenship or residence decisions require a strategic view and consideration of capital.

I begin by defining the objective: the outcome the client needs, the facts that affect the choice, and the matters that require further review. I then establish the available directions, the sequence of work, and the key decision points.

Once the strategy has been agreed, I oversee the BRIDGES team's key decisions and remain involved at the stages that shape the course of the matter. The purpose is to give the client a clear rationale for the chosen direction and a precise understanding of the next steps.

Prepared on the basis of BRIDGES practice and reviewed by a subject-matter expert.

Discuss your situation with Sergey

We will review your situation and propose a solution

Describe your task in a few words. We will study your situation, assess the legal and practical options and propose the next step based on your goals, documents and country.

Confidential · no obligations · answered by the relevant specialist

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Anna KovalevskayaHead of Legal, BRIDGES
Anna Kovalevskaya, Head of Legal, BRIDGES

Names and certain details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. The result described reflects one specific situation and is neither a public offer nor a guarantee of a similar outcome. Programme terms are stated as of 2026 and may change - please confirm current parameters with a BRIDGES consultant.