Updated: June 2026

Case study · Antigua and Barbuda · Citizenship by investment

How we confirmed the source of inheritancewith closed state registries

Inheritance is a legitimate source of funds, but it is difficult to verify when state registries are closed or inaccessible: in the country of origin, archives may not function, and data may not be released. Yet verification requires evidence. Our client faced precisely this situation. We explain how we verified the inheritance using alternative documents when official registries provided no information.

Sergey EvdokimovSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGESReading time9 min readVerificationReviewed by an expert

This case is based on a real matter. The name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

BRIDGES client story - How we confirmed the source of inheritance with closed state registries
Contents

Case at a glance

Situation, solution and outcome in seven lines

Client
Heir whose country-of-origin registries are inaccessible
Objective
verify the source of inheritance funds
Program
Antigua and Barbuda, Citizenship by Investment
Complexity
state registries closed/inaccessible
What was required
prove inheritance bypassing inaccessible registries
Solution
alternative documents and official confirmations
Outcome
source verified, passport obtained

Client story

Client's story

Where they started

The client's source of funds was inheritance—legitimate and real. However, verification through standard channels was impossible: state registries in the country of origin were closed or inaccessible, and required data was not officially available. The funds were legitimate, yet the usual registry certificate did not exist.

Why the standard route did not work

Due diligence requirements, however, remain unchanged: the source of funds must be proven, and "I have an inheritance but cannot obtain a certificate" does not suffice. A trap emerged: the source is legitimate, but proving it through standard means is impossible due to registry inaccessibility. Giving up was not an option—alternative proof methods had to be explored.

What BRIDGES had to solve

Therefore, we bypassed the inaccessible registries through alternative documents. We gathered everything that confirmed the inheritance through other means: notarial acts and a will, if preserved by the client or with the notary; bank documents evidencing receipt of inherited funds; court or other official documents regarding the inheritance matter; confirmations from competent authorities. From these sources, we constructed a complete and compelling inheritance narrative—one that verified the source even without an extract from the closed registry.

Why a standard answer would not do

At BRIDGES, the client came to us with this dilemma: verifying legitimate inheritance for Antigua's due diligence when state registries are closed—through alternative documents.

My funds are inheritance—everything is legitimate—but registries in my country of origin are closed, and I could not obtain the standard certificate. Yet due diligence requires proof. Dmitry did not give up: we bypassed the registries by gathering notarial acts, a will, bank documents evidencing receipt of inherited funds, and papers from the inheritance proceedings. From all of this, we constructed a complete inheritance narrative. Due diligence saw a verified source even without an extract from the closed registry, and I obtained my passport. The solution was found through alternative documents.

Naslednik · HeirThe name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

What was at stake

What was at stake

The risk lay not in the legitimacy of the funds, but in the trap: the source is legitimate, but registries are closed, and verifying inheritance through standard means is impossible. Giving up would have meant failing due diligence. The key was finding alternative proof methods—constructing the inheritance from other official documents.

that the source is legitimate inheritance;

  1. 01that state registries are closed or inaccessible;
  2. 02that due diligence nevertheless requires proof of source;
  3. 03that alternative documents must be used to bypass registries;
  4. 04that other sources combine to form a complete inheritance narrative.

The logic of the solution

How the matter progressed: from checks to result

The chart is built from the facts of this matter and shows the logic of the work without decorative or unverified data.

  1. 01
    Stage 1

    We identified the trap. First, we recognized the essence: the source is legitimate, but registries are closed, and customary verification is unavailable. This shifted the task to finding alternative paths of proof.

  2. 02
    Stage 2

    We determined what was accessible outside the registry. We compiled a list of documents that could confirm inheritance differently: a will, notarial acts, banking and court documents regarding the inheritance matter.

  3. 03
    Stage 3

    We collected documents proving inheritance rights. We obtained a will and notarial acts (retained in the client's possession or with the notary) confirming the legitimate basis of inheritance.

  4. 04
    Stage 4

    We verified receipt of inheritance funds. We provided banking documents showing that funds were received specifically as inheritance—linking the legal basis to the money.

  5. 05
    Stage 5

    We constructed a complete picture of inheritance. We consolidated documents from various sources into a single, compelling narrative confirming the source without an extract from a closed registry.

Takeaway. Conclusion: inheritance is legitimate, but with closed registries it requires alternative proof. A will, notarial acts, banking and court documents combine to form a complete picture confirming the source without a registry extract.

How we solved the task

How we solved the task

The work was split into verifiable stages so that every conclusion rested on documents.

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    We identified the trap. First, we recognized the essence: the source is legitimate, but registries are closed, and customary verification is unavailable. This shifted the task to finding alternative paths of proof.

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    We determined what was accessible outside the registry. We compiled a list of documents that could confirm inheritance differently: a will, notarial acts, banking and court documents regarding the inheritance matter.

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    We collected documents proving inheritance rights. We obtained a will and notarial acts (retained in the client's possession or with the notary) confirming the legitimate basis of inheritance.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    We verified receipt of inheritance funds. We provided banking documents showing that funds were received specifically as inheritance—linking the legal basis to the money.

  5. 05

    Stage 5

    We constructed a complete picture of inheritance. We consolidated documents from various sources into a single, compelling narrative confirming the source without an extract from a closed registry.

  6. 06

    Stage 6

    We passed verification and obtained a passport. With alternatively verified inheritance, Antigua's verification authorities recognized a legitimate source, and the client obtained citizenship. Closed registries ceased to be a dead end.

Expert comment

Verifying inheritance with closed registries is a classic trap: the funds are absolutely legitimate, yet there is nowhere to obtain the customary certificate because archives in the country of origin are closed or data is not released. Verification here does not make allowances—the source of funds must still be proven. Many give up in such situations, but I work around the registry through alternative documents. Inheritance almost always leaves traces beyond the state registry: there is a will and notarial acts, there are banking documents confirming receipt of inheritance funds, there are court or other official papers on the inheritance matter, there are certifications from competent persons. I collect all of this and construct a complete, compelling picture of inheritance—one that confirms the source even without an extract from a closed registry. With this client, we did exactly that—we verified the inheritance alternatively, and he passed verification. With closed registries, there is one rule: do not give up, but seek other official sources of evidence.

Sergey Evdokimov, Managing Partner, BRIDGESSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGES

Outcome

What the client received

What was required
How we did it · Result
Verify inheritance
alternative documents bypassing the registry · source proven
Proof of inheritance rights
will, notarial acts · legitimate legal basis
Link to the funds
banking documents on receipt · funds from inheritance
Pass verification
complete picture of inheritance · Antigua and Barbuda citizenship
Pass verification
complete picture of inheritance · Antigua and Barbuda citizenship

What was: the client's source of funds was legitimate inheritance, but state registries were closed, and it was impossible to verify it through customary means. What we did: identified the trap; determined what was accessible outside the registry; collected documents proving inheritance rights; verified receipt of inheritance funds; constructed a complete picture of inheritance; passed verification and obtained a passport. What the client received: verified source and Antigua and Barbuda citizenship.

Practical takeaway

What matters in a similar situation

  • Conclusion: inheritance is legitimate, but with closed registries it requires alternative proof. A will, notarial acts, banking and court documents combine to form a complete picture confirming the source without a registry extract.
  • The client verified the source and obtained a passport—because we worked around closed registries and assembled the inheritance from alternative official documents rather than surrendering to archive inaccessibility.

FAQ

Questions people ask in a similar situation

01Is it possible to verify inheritance if registries are closed?

Yes, through alternative evidence. When state registries are inaccessible, inheritance is verified through other official documents: a will, notarial acts, banking and court documents regarding the inheritance matter.

02Does verification reduce requirements due to registry inaccessibility?

No. The source of funds must still be proven. Therefore, with closed registries, alternative methods of confirmation are sought rather than relying on leniency in verification.

03What documents confirm inheritance outside the registry?

Will, notarial acts, bank documents confirming receipt of inheritance funds, court and other official documents on inheritance matters, certifications from competent authorities.

04What should be done if archives in the country of origin are non-operational?

Do not give up, but gather inheritance evidence from available official sources and construct a complete picture of inheritance that will confirm the source even without an extract from the closed registry.

05What is the cost of Antigua and Barbuda citizenship?

Non-refundable contribution to the National Development Fund (NDF) from $230,000 for a family of up to 4 persons or other program options. Exact terms are clarified with the authorized body.

06Source is inheritance, but registries are closed or inaccessible?

We will confirm inheritance outside inaccessible registries—through wills, notarial acts, bank and court documents—and construct a complete picture of inheritance so that Antigua's verification sees a lawful source.

About the author

Sergey Evdokimov

Author: Sergey Evdokimov

Managing Partner, BRIDGES

As Founder and Managing Partner of BRIDGES, I am responsible for the firm's strategy and personally lead its most complex client matters, including cases in which citizenship or residence decisions require a strategic view and consideration of capital.

I begin by defining the objective: the outcome the client needs, the facts that affect the choice, and the matters that require further review. I then establish the available directions, the sequence of work, and the key decision points.

Once the strategy has been agreed, I oversee the BRIDGES team's key decisions and remain involved at the stages that shape the course of the matter. The purpose is to give the client a clear rationale for the chosen direction and a precise understanding of the next steps.

Prepared on the basis of BRIDGES practice and reviewed by a subject-matter expert.

Discuss your situation with Sergey

We will review your situation and propose a solution

Describe your task in a few words. We will study your situation, assess the legal and practical options and propose the next step based on your goals, documents and country.

Confidential · no obligations · answered by the relevant specialist

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Anna KovalevskayaHead of Legal, BRIDGES
Anna Kovalevskaya, Head of Legal, BRIDGES

Names and certain details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. The result described reflects one specific situation and is neither a public offer nor a guarantee of a similar outcome. Programme terms are stated as of 2026 and may change - please confirm current parameters with a BRIDGES consultant.