Updated

GL-W-03

Glossary · Due Diligence and compliance

Watchlist screening - checks against sanctions, PEP, wanted lists and adverse media

Watchlist screening — matching a client against databases of sanctions, PEPs, wanted persons and negative mentions during compliance.

Full glossary
screeningagainst many databases
sanctions, PEPsand wanted lists
reviewof matches

01 / In 30 seconds

The short answer

What it is
Watchlist screening — checking a client against watchlists
What they are checked against
Sanctions, PEPs, wanted lists, adverse mentions
When
At onboarding, in due diligence, in ongoing monitoring
Bottom line
Matches are reviewed: confirmed or cleared
How to use it
Check yourself in advance and clear false matches

02 / In plain words

What Watchlist screening means

Watchlist screening is checking a person or company against various “watchlists”, carried out by compliance. Unlike narrow sanctions screening, it covers a wider set of databases: sanctions lists, lists of politically exposed persons (PEPs), wanted-person databases (including Interpol), and sources of negative information in the media and public registers.

The aim of such a check is to build a complete picture of the risks associated with the client: whether they are under sanctions, whether they are a PEP, whether they are wanted, whether there is serious negative information about them. The check is carried out at onboarding, as part of due diligence and then during ongoing monitoring. As with sanctions screening, false name matches are possible and need to be reviewed and cleared properly.

For the client this means being checked not against one database but against many at once, and a match in any of them may raise questions. But a match is not an automatic refusal — it is a reason for review: it is either confirmed or cleared as false or out of date. We carry out the same check against the key watchlists in advance and help clear any false or contentious matches before filing.

A case from practice

A client is clear on sanctions, but watchlist screening reveals an old negative media mention and PEP status. Without review this would have held up the process. We find these matches in advance, explain the PEP status and the context of the publication — and the broad check goes through without delays.

Where the check is used

  • Onboarding and due diligence
  • Ongoing client monitoring
  • Checking for sanctions, PEP status and wanted notices
  • Searching for negative information
  • Clearing false matches
  • A comprehensive assessment of client risk

03 / What it covers

What watchlist screening covers

01

Lists

  • Sanctions databases
  • PEP lists
  • Wanted-person databases (Interpol)
02

Sources

  • Negative media
  • Public registers
  • Adverse media
03

When

  • At onboarding
  • In due diligence
  • In monitoring
04

Matches

  • Reviewed, not an instant refusal
  • Confirm or clear
  • False name matches

04 / How it works

How the check works

Step 1

A preliminary self-check

We check you against the same databases as the bank.

Step 2

Checking against watchlists

Sanctions, PEP, wanted lists, media.

Step 3

Reviewing matches

We separate namesakes from real matches.

Step 4

Clearing false positives

Documents showing the match is not you.

Step 5

A clean result

The check goes through without delays.

05 / Key facts

What you need to know

01What is checked

Many databases at once

Sanctions lists, PEP databases, wanted lists including Interpol, adverse mentions in the media and registers.

02Difference from sanctions screening

Broader

A sanctions check looks only at sanctions. Here the risk picture is fuller.

03When

Throughout the relationship

At onboarding, during due diligence and then in ongoing monitoring.

04A match

A reason to review

A match is either confirmed or cleared as false. Often it is simply a namesake.

Common mistakes

Preparing for sanctions checks only

Check yourself against PEP lists, wanted lists and adverse media too.

Not checking yourself in advance

Run the same check before applying and see any matches first.

Not preparing explanations for mentions

Gather documents and context for every disputed mention.

06 / Expert advice

Klara Rihter

How to prepare in advance

Before a serious check, check yourself against the key watchlists — not only sanctions but also PEP lists, wanted notices and adverse media. Matches identified in advance are reviewed: false name matches are cleared with documents, contentious mentions explained. Then the broad watchlist check goes through cleanly, and matches do not become an unexpected obstacle.

What we do for you. We carry out for the client the same broad watchlist check that compliance does: sanctions, PEP status, wanted notices, adverse media. We find and review matches in advance — clearing false ones with documents and explaining contentious ones. That way the multiple check goes through cleanly, with no unexpected obstacles on the bank’s side.

Klara RihterBanking compliance and source of funds specialist

07 / Questions

Frequently asked questions

Checking a person or company against a set of databases: sanctions, PEPs, wanted notices (including Interpol), and negative mentions in the media and registers.

Sanctions screening checks only against sanctions lists, whereas watchlist screening also checks PEP databases, wanted notices and sources of negative information. The risk picture is fuller.

At onboarding, as part of due diligence and then during ongoing monitoring — that is, both at the start of the relationship and throughout it.

No. A match is a reason for review: it is either confirmed or cleared as false or out of date. Many matches turn out to be with a namesake.

Review it: clear a false name match with documents, explain a contentious mention in context. We carry out a preliminary check and help clear matches.

Check yourself against the key watchlists in advance and review possible matches. We carry out such a check and prepare explanations before filing.

Author: Klara Rihter

Reviewed by: Dmitry Nagy

Sources: FATF — on customer screening

INITIAL ASSESSMENT

Tell us what outcome your family needs

We will design a solution for your case, choose the country and the right status, and take the whole process through to the result.

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Anna Kovalevskaya, lead lawyer at BRIDGES GLOBAL
Anna KovalevskayaLead lawyer, citizenship and residency, 12 years of practice