GAAR
General Anti-Avoidance Rule
- What it is
- A general rule against abuse of tax law
- Against what
- Against artificial schemes whose only purpose is a tax saving
- The key criterion
- The existence of a business purpose beyond reducing tax
- What happens
- The tax authority may recalculate the tax as if the scheme did not exist
- Why it matters
- The formal legality of each step is no protection if the scheme is artificial
In plain words
GAAR (general anti-avoidance rule) is a general rule against abuse of tax law. Its distinctive feature is that it does not list specific prohibited schemes: instead it sets a general criterion allowing the tax authority to disregard an artificial arrangement created mainly for a tax benefit.
The logic is simple. Each individual step of a scheme may be formally lawful: the company was set up in accordance with the law, the contract is valid, the payment went through. But if the arrangement as a whole has no economic sense beyond reducing tax, the tax authority may look at the substance of the transaction rather than its form and recalculate the liabilities as if the scheme did not exist.
The key criterion is roughly the same in all formulations — the existence of a business purpose. A reorganisation for ease of management, setting up a company for a real market, moving functions to where the activity takes place — all of this has a rationale. An arrangement set up a month before a transaction and having no content other than the tax result is a typical target of such a rule.
When it may be applied
What the tax authority assesses
- Whether there is a business purpose
- The balance of purposes
- Economic sense
- Actual activity
- Staff and functions
- Place where decisions are taken
- Set up before the transaction
- No other content
- Circular transactions
- Recalculation of tax
- Interest and penalties
- Litigation
How to reduce the risk
- 01Formulate the business purpose
- 02Ensure the transactions are real
- 03Document the rationale
- 04Avoid artificial steps
- 05Be ready to explain the structure
What you need to know
- The rule is general, not a list of specific prohibitions
- The formal legality of the steps does not guarantee the scheme will be recognised
- The substance of the transaction is assessed, not only its form
- The key criterion is the existence of a business purpose
- The wording of the rule differs between countries
Common mistakes
- Assuming the legality of each step protects the scheme
- Setting up a structure immediately before a transaction
- Having no documented rationale for the business purpose
- Building arrangements without real activity
- Copying a scheme found on the internet
What this means for a BRIDGES client
We do not build schemes for clients that rest solely on the tax result. Such arrangements create a risk that materialises years later — at the worst possible moment, in an audit or when the business is sold.
Frequently asked questions
01 /What is GAAR?
A general rule against abuse of tax law: it allows an artificial scheme created mainly for a tax benefit to be disregarded.
02 /How does it differ from specific prohibitions?
It does not list schemes but sets a general criterion. So an arrangement that formally breaches no specific rule may still fall within it.
03 /Does the legality of each step protect me?
Not always. The arrangement is assessed as a whole: if it has no economic sense beyond the tax one, its form offers no protection.
04 /What is a business purpose?
A rationale for a transaction unrelated to reducing tax: ease of management, entering a market, bringing in an investor, ring-fencing risks.
05 /What happens if the rule is applied?
The tax authority may recalculate the liabilities as if the scheme did not exist, charging interest and penalties. A court dispute is possible.
06 /How to reduce the risk?
Have a real business purpose, ensure the transactions have actual substance and document the rationale at the time decisions are taken.
See also
Read next


This material has undergone editorial review by BRIDGES.
Planning a restructuring?
We will work through the business rationale of the arrangement — so that it withstands scrutiny, not just saves tax.