Updated: June 2026

Case study · Sao Tome and Principe · Citizenship

How a Fintech Founder Used a São Tomé Passportto Establish a Base and Scale in the EU

For a fintech founder, EU expansion involves two distinct matters: personal mobility and establishing a base in Europe on one hand, and obtaining a regulatory license on the other. These are often confused. Our client planned EU scaling. To be clear from the start: a passport provides a foundation and a pathway, but it does not issue a fintech license. We explain how São Tomé became the foundation for EU market entry.

Sergey EvdokimovSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGESReading time9 min readVerificationReviewed by an expert

This case is based on a real matter. The name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

BRIDGES client story - How a Fintech Founder Used a São Tomé Passport to Establish a Base and Scale in the EU
Contents

Case at a glance

Situation, solution and outcome in seven lines

Client
Fintech Startup Founder
Objective
Establish a base for EU scaling
Program
São Tomé and Príncipe, Citizenship by Investment
Common Misconceptions
Personal base/mobility versus regulatory licensing
What the Passport Provides
CPLP member status and pathway to Portugal residency
Clear Boundaries
EU fintech licensing is processed separately
Outcome
Foundation for EU market entry; licensing handled through separate track

Client story

Client Background

Where they started

The client was a fintech startup founder planning to scale into the EU market. He needed a European foothold: personal mobility, the ability to establish himself closer to the market, and to build his business from Europe.

Why the standard route did not work

It is essential to distinguish between two matters that founders frequently conflate. First—personal base and mobility: where the founder can be located, reside, and establish presence. Second—regulatory fintech licensing: the company's right to provide financial services in the EU, which is granted by the relevant regulator through a separate, rigorous procedure. A passport addresses the first matter and does not substitute for the second.

What BRIDGES had to solve

What São Tomé realistically provides the founder is a convenient base. As a CPLP member closely connected to Portugal, the country opens a pathway to Portuguese residency under the CPLP mobility agreement: the founder can establish himself in Portugal, at the heart of the EU, and build his company from there. This creates a strong personal and business foundation. However, his company obtains the fintech license separately, through the relevant regulator—the passport neither issues nor materially accelerates it.

Why a standard answer would not do

At BRIDGES, the client sought a clearly defined foundation: to obtain a São Tomé passport leveraging CPLP country status and establish a base for EU presence—with the clear understanding that regulatory licensing remains a separate track.

I am building a fintech and wanted to scale in the EU. Sergey immediately separated two things I had conflated: establishing a personal base in Europe is one matter, while a fintech license is something entirely different—issued by the regulator through its own procedure. The São Tomé passport, as a CPLP country, gave me a pathway to Portuguese residency—a base in the heart of the EU, from which I now build my company. But he was clear: the passport does not issue a license; that is a separate track. Without that clarity, I would have made critical errors. I gained a solid foundation for entering the European market.

Osnovatel · Fintech FounderThe name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

What Was at Risk

What Was at Risk

The risk was not an external barrier, but rather conflating two distinct matters: personal base and regulatory licensing. To believe that a passport issues or accelerates a fintech license would be to build a plan on a false foundation. The key was to secure a genuine base for the EU through CPLP status and to clearly understand that licensing is a separate track.

Personal base and regulatory licensing are different matters

  1. 01Fintech licensing is issued by the relevant regulator through its own procedure
  2. 02A passport neither issues nor materially accelerates licensing
  3. 03São Tomé is a CPLP member, opening a pathway to Portuguese residency
  4. 04Portugal as a base provides a strong foothold in the heart of the EU

The logic of the solution

How the matter progressed: from checks to result

The chart is built from the facts of this matter and shows the logic of the work without decorative or unverified data.

  1. 01
    Stage 1

    Separated base from licensing. First, we clearly distinguished personal base/mobility from regulatory fintech licensing, so the founder would not build a plan conflating these elements.

  2. 02
    Stage 2

    Clarified what the passport does not do. We stated directly: the passport neither grants nor materially accelerates fintech licensing—the sector regulator issues it through its own procedure. The client entered without illusions.

  3. 03
    Stage 3

    Demonstrated real base through CPLP. We explained that São Tomé, a CPLP member, opens a pathway to Portugal residency, providing the founder with a foothold at the heart of the EU.

  4. 04
    Stage 4

    Obtained São Tomé Passport. We secured citizenship of São Tomé for the client—a CPLP member state status supporting the pathway to Portuguese residency and European presence.

  5. 05
    Stage 5

    Established European foundation. With the passport and CPLP pathway, the founder gained the ability to establish himself in Portugal and build the company from within the EU—a strong personal and business foundation.

Takeaway. Conclusion: Fintech entry into the EU comprises personal base plus regulatory licensing. A São Tomé passport provides the base and CPLP pathway to Portugal, but the regulator issues the license separately; the passport does not substitute for it.

How We Solved the Challenge

How We Solved the Challenge

The work was split into verifiable stages so that every conclusion rested on documents.

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    Separated base from licensing. First, we clearly distinguished personal base/mobility from regulatory fintech licensing, so the founder would not build a plan conflating these elements.

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    Clarified what the passport does not do. We stated directly: the passport neither grants nor materially accelerates fintech licensing—the sector regulator issues it through its own procedure. The client entered without illusions.

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    Demonstrated real base through CPLP. We explained that São Tomé, a CPLP member, opens a pathway to Portugal residency, providing the founder with a foothold at the heart of the EU.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    Obtained São Tomé Passport. We secured citizenship of São Tomé for the client—a CPLP member state status supporting the pathway to Portuguese residency and European presence.

  5. 05

    Stage 5

    Established European foundation. With the passport and CPLP pathway, the founder gained the ability to establish himself in Portugal and build the company from within the EU—a strong personal and business foundation.

  6. 06

    Stage 6

    Left licensing as a separate track. We clearly stated: his company's acquisition of fintech licensing is conducted separately through the regulator. The passport provided the base for entry, not the right to provide financial services.

Expert comment

With fintech founders, I first separate two things they almost always conflate. One is personal base and mobility: where you can be, live, establish yourself closer to the market. The other is regulatory fintech licensing: the right of your company to provide financial services in the EU, issued by the sector regulator through a separate and rigorous procedure. The passport addresses the first and absolutely does not replace the second—and I state this immediately because building a plan on the illusion that "the passport will secure the license" is dangerous. What São Tomé genuinely provides is a strong base: as a CPLP member, the country opens a pathway to Portugal residency, and the founder can establish himself at the heart of the EU and build the company from there. This is serious support. But the license he obtains separately, on his own track, through the regulator. For this client, we provided an honestly delineated base for EU market entry—and he builds forward, understanding where the passport helps and where regulation operates. This honesty saves founders months and money.

Sergey Evdokimov, Managing Partner, BRIDGESSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGES

Outcome

What the client received

Requirements
How We Delivered · Outcome
EU Base
CPLP status + Portugal pathway · Foothold at Europe's heart
Without Concept Confusion
Base and licensing separated · Plan on solid foundation
Personal Mobility
São Tomé passport · Presence closer to market
Licensing - Transparently
Separate track clarified · Realistic expectations
Licensing - Transparently
Separate track clarified · Realistic expectations

Situation: A fintech founder planned EU expansion and needed a European foundation. Action taken: separated base from licensing; clarified what the passport does not do; demonstrated the real base through CPLP; obtained São Tomé passport; established European foundation; left licensing as a separate track. Client outcome: a base for EU market entry via CPLP status and a pathway to Portugal residency—with clear understanding that licensing is obtained separately.

Practical takeaway

What matters in a similar situation

  • Conclusion: Fintech entry into the EU comprises personal base plus regulatory licensing. A São Tomé passport provides the base and CPLP pathway to Portugal, but the regulator issues the license separately; the passport does not substitute for it.
  • The founder secured a robust EU entry base—because we provided CPLP member state status and a pathway to Portugal residency, honestly clarifying that fintech licensing remains a separate regulatory track.

FAQ

Questions people ask in a similar situation

01Does a São Tomé Passport Grant an EU Fintech License?

No. The sector regulator issues the fintech license through a separate procedure. The passport neither substitutes for it nor materially accelerates it—it provides personal base and a pathway to Europe, not the right to provide financial services.

02How Does the Passport Then Assist a Fintech Founder?

It provides base and mobility: as a CPLP member, São Tomé opens a pathway to Portugal residency, and the founder can establish himself at the heart of the EU and build his company from there. This constitutes strong personal and business support.

03What is the CPLP pathway to Portugal?

São Tomé is a member of the Community of Portuguese Language Countries, which opens a pathway to Portuguese residence under the CPLP mobility agreement. This provides an EU base, but not a fintech license or automatic Portuguese citizenship.

04Why is it important to distinguish between a base and a license?

Because building a strategy on the conflation of these elements is risky. A passport provides mobility and a base; a regulator issues a license. Clear separation saves founders time and money.

05What is the cost of São Tomé citizenship?

A non-refundable contribution to the National Transformation Fund of USD 90,000 per applicant. Exact terms are to be confirmed with the authorized body.

06Building a fintech and planning for EU expansion?

We provide a clearly defined base for market entry into Europe: a São Tomé passport as CPLP country status and a pathway to Portuguese residence—a foothold in the heart of the EU—while understanding that your company obtains a fintech license through a separate regulatory track.

About the author

Sergey Evdokimov

Author: Sergey Evdokimov

Managing Partner, BRIDGES

As Founder and Managing Partner of BRIDGES, I am responsible for the firm's strategy and personally lead its most complex client matters, including cases in which citizenship or residence decisions require a strategic view and consideration of capital.

I begin by defining the objective: the outcome the client needs, the facts that affect the choice, and the matters that require further review. I then establish the available directions, the sequence of work, and the key decision points.

Once the strategy has been agreed, I oversee the BRIDGES team's key decisions and remain involved at the stages that shape the course of the matter. The purpose is to give the client a clear rationale for the chosen direction and a precise understanding of the next steps.

Prepared on the basis of BRIDGES practice and reviewed by a subject-matter expert.

Discuss your situation with Sergey

We will review your situation and propose a solution

Describe your task in a few words. We will study your situation, assess the legal and practical options and propose the next step based on your goals, documents and country.

Confidential · no obligations · answered by the relevant specialist

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Anna KovalevskayaHead of Legal, BRIDGES
Anna Kovalevskaya, Head of Legal, BRIDGES

Names and certain details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. The result described reflects one specific situation and is neither a public offer nor a guarantee of a similar outcome. Programme terms are stated as of 2026 and may change - please confirm current parameters with a BRIDGES consultant.