Client story
Client Story
Where they started
The family thought in generational terms: they needed to structure their inheritance so it would reliably pass to their children and grandchildren. The instrument was a legacy fund—a structure designed for long-term asset preservation and transfer.
Why the standard route did not work
However, the family understood a nuance that many overlook: the resilience of such a structure depends not only on its legal form but also on the founder's citizenship. A passport with geopolitical baggage or strict limitations could make the entire structure less flexible and more vulnerable to external factors.
What BRIDGES had to solve
This is where a neutral second citizenship proved invaluable. A passport from a neutral jurisdiction—like island nation Nauru in the Pacific—provided the fund founder with a more flexible and resilient foundation for the structure. Nauru is also attractive because it does not tax worldwide income with personal income tax, which is significant for long-term planning. That said, specific tax and legal questions regarding the fund fall within the scope of specialized professionals; citizenship provides the foundation here rather than replacing tax planning.
Why a standard answer would not do
The family came to BRIDGES to establish the right foundation: obtain a neutral second Nauru passport for their legacy fund and integrate it into a long-term structure together with specialized legacy planning professionals.
We were establishing a legacy fund for our children and grandchildren and understood that what matters is not only the structure itself but also the citizenship of the person behind it. Dmitry explained that a neutral passport makes the structure more flexible and resilient, and Nauru also does not tax worldwide income. We obtained second citizenship and made it the foundation of our fund—together with our tax specialists. Now our legacy structure has a reliable and flexible foundation for the future.





