Updated: June 2026

Case study · Malta · Tax

How a Belarusian Citizen from a Red Zone Obtained MalteseCitizenship by Merit for Scientific Contribution

Sometimes the main obstacle is not a person, but a line in a passport. Malta suspended acceptance of citizenship applications from Belarusian citizens, and compliance automatically rejected Mikhail's requests upon seeing a Belarusian passport, despite his Polish residence permit and functioning IT business in Warsaw. We explain how we built a case based not on citizenship of origin, but on the applicant's actual life and merits.

Sergey EvdokimovSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGESReading time10 min readVerificationReviewed by an expert

This case is based on a real matter. The name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

BRIDGES client story - How a Belarusian Citizen from a Red Zone Obtained Maltese Citizenship by Merit for Scientific Contribution
Contents

Case at a glance

Situation, solution and outcome in seven lines

Client
Mikhail, approximately 40 years old, IT entrepreneur
Origin
Belarusian citizen, Polish residence permit, business in Warsaw
Program
Malta, citizenship by merit (naturalization)
Challenge
Application suspension for Belarusian citizens, automatic compliance rejection
Case Foundation
Long-term residence outside country of origin
Merit
Scientific contribution freely transferred to Maltese university
Outcome
Extraordinary naturalization by merit

Client story

Client's Story

Where they started

Mikhail has long lived far from where he was born. A Belarusian citizen, he relocated to Poland several years ago, obtained a residence permit, built an IT business in Warsaw, and effectively became part of the European technology sector. Belarus remained only in his passport, not in his life.

Why the standard route did not work

When he applied for Maltese citizenship by merit, the system reacted to one line—country of citizenship. Malta had at that time suspended acceptance of applications from Belarusian citizens, and compliance automatically rejected his application without examining the substance. His Polish residence permit, business, and EU taxes were all disregarded.

What BRIDGES had to solve

Mikhail faced an unfair but real logic: he was evaluated not as an entrepreneur and specialist, but as a holder of an "inconvenient" passport. Yet substantively, he was precisely the type of candidate for whom merit-based naturalization is designed—a person with genuine contribution, not a status purchaser.

Why a standard answer would not do

He came to BRIDGES for a strategy because the standard route was closed. We needed to shift the authority's focus from citizenship of origin to the applicant's actual life and his merits to the country.

I was rejected without anyone looking at who I am or what I do—simply based on my passport. It hurt my pride: I have been living and working in the EU for a long time, paying taxes, creating a product. BRIDGES proposed building the case not on where I was born, but on what I actually accomplished. And it worked.

Mikhail, 40 · Mikhail, IT entrepreneurThe name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

What Was at Risk

What Was at Risk

Automated compliance does not discern nuances: it sees a country on the blocked list and closes the door. To open it, one must shift focus from formal citizenship to the applicant's actual, documentary-supported connection to another jurisdiction and his merits.

Automatic compliance rejection upon presentation of Belarusian passport;

  1. 01Disregard for Polish residence permit, business, and EU taxes;
  2. 02Evaluation based on country of origin rather than actual contribution;
  3. 03Absence of standard pathway for citizens from the blocked category;
  4. 04Risk that actual merits would not be considered on the substance at all.

The logic of the solution

How the matter progressed: from checks to result

The chart is built from the facts of this matter and shows the logic of the work without decorative or unverified data.

  1. 01
    Stage 1

    We analyzed the situation and rejected the standard path, which was predetermined to be closed based on citizenship country.

  2. 02
    Stage 2

    We built the case foundation on Mikhail's long-term residency outside his country of origin - Polish residence permit, center of life and business in the EU.

  3. 03
    Stage 3

    We documented tax and business integration in Europe to demonstrate a real, not formal, connection.

  4. 04
    Stage 4

    We formalized the merit: Mikhail's scientific result, transferred free of charge to the University of Malta, with confirmation of the contribution's value.

  5. 05
    Stage 5

    We prepared justification for extraordinary naturalization in exceptional proceedings - with emphasis on benefit to the nation.

Takeaway. For Mikhail, this was not only a practical victory - an EU passport - but also substantive recognition: he was evaluated as a specialist and person with a contribution, not as a holder of an inconvenient passport.

How we solved the task

How we solved the task

The work was split into verifiable stages so that every conclusion rested on documents.

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    We analyzed the situation and rejected the standard path, which was predetermined to be closed based on citizenship country.

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    We built the case foundation on Mikhail's long-term residency outside his country of origin - Polish residence permit, center of life and business in the EU.

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    We documented tax and business integration in Europe to demonstrate a real, not formal, connection.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    We formalized the merit: Mikhail's scientific result, transferred free of charge to the University of Malta, with confirmation of the contribution's value.

  5. 05

    Stage 5

    We prepared justification for extraordinary naturalization in exceptional proceedings - with emphasis on benefit to the nation.

  6. 06

    Stage 6

    We accompanied the review process, responding to the authority's questions and maintaining focus on contribution rather than country of origin.

Expert comment

This was precisely the kind of difficult, contentious case that I work on. Formally the door is closed - the country is on a stop-list, compliance rejects automatically. But merit-based naturalization, by its nature, evaluates a person's contribution, not their passport. Our task was to make the system see the real Mikhail: an EU resident, entrepreneur, scientist, whose result proved useful to Malta itself. When the focus shifted from origin to benefit to the nation, the case came to life.

Sergey Evdokimov, Managing Partner, BRIDGESSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGES

Outcome

What the client received

Indicator
Before · After
Compliance response
automatic rejection based on passport · substantive review
Evaluation basis
country of origin · EU residency + contribution
Merit
not considered · scientific contribution recognized
Outcome
door closed · merit-based naturalization
Outcome
door closed · merit-based naturalization

Mikhail obtained citizenship through extraordinary merit-based naturalization. The case succeeded not despite compliance, but through a shift in the very logic of consideration: the authority evaluated long-term EU residency and actual scientific contribution, not country of origin.

Practical takeaway

What matters in a similar situation

  • For Mikhail, this was not only a practical victory - an EU passport - but also substantive recognition: he was evaluated as a specialist and person with a contribution, not as a holder of an inconvenient passport.
  • The case demonstrates that even a blocked category is not always a dead end. When there is real life outside the country of origin and demonstrable benefit to the nation, the path of merit-based naturalization can open where the standard path is closed. However, this requires honest facts, not fine words.

FAQ

Questions people ask in a similar situation

01Is citizenship by merit realistic for citizens from the stop-list?

The standard path may be closed, but merit-based naturalization for outstanding contributions evaluates a person's contribution. The case is built on long-term residency outside the country of origin and proven benefit to the nation.

02What counts as merit?

Real contribution - scientific, cultural, economic - that benefits Malta. In this case, a scientific result transferred free of charge to the University of Malta.

03Does residency status in another EU country help?

Yes. Long-term residency and business integration in the EU shift evaluation from citizenship of origin to a person's actual connection with Europe.

04Is this a guaranteed path?

No. The decision is made by the competent Malta authority in exceptional proceedings. We build the strongest possible justification, but the outcome is within its discretion.

05How does this differ from purchasing citizenship?

Fundamentally: actual contribution is assessed, not the investment amount. The previous investment program has been closed, and naturalization by merit is based on benefits to the nation.

06Is the door closed by your passport country, despite your real life and contribution to the EU?

We will assess your situation, build a case based on residency outside your country of origin and genuine merit, and prepare substantiation for Malta naturalization by merit.

About the author

Sergey Evdokimov

Author: Sergey Evdokimov

Managing Partner, BRIDGES

As Founder and Managing Partner of BRIDGES, I am responsible for the firm's strategy and personally lead its most complex client matters, including cases in which citizenship or residence decisions require a strategic view and consideration of capital.

I begin by defining the objective: the outcome the client needs, the facts that affect the choice, and the matters that require further review. I then establish the available directions, the sequence of work, and the key decision points.

Once the strategy has been agreed, I oversee the BRIDGES team's key decisions and remain involved at the stages that shape the course of the matter. The purpose is to give the client a clear rationale for the chosen direction and a precise understanding of the next steps.

Prepared on the basis of BRIDGES practice and reviewed by a subject-matter expert.

Discuss your situation with Sergey

We will review your situation and propose a solution

Describe your task in a few words. We will study your situation, assess the legal and practical options and propose the next step based on your goals, documents and country.

Confidential · no obligations · answered by the relevant specialist

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Dmitry NagyInternational Tax Consultant, BRIDGES
Dmitry Nagy, International Tax Consultant, BRIDGES

Names and certain details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. The result described reflects one specific situation and is neither a public offer nor a guarantee of a similar outcome. Programme terms are stated as of 2026 and may change - please confirm current parameters with a BRIDGES consultant.