Updated: June 2026

Case study · Portugal · Residence permit

How an Investor Redirected Capital from Real Estate into a VentureFund and Obtained Portuguese Residence Permit

When real estate was removed from the Golden Visa program, many investors were confused - but for those who think in terms of returns, a more interesting door opened. Our client initially looked at apartments, but ultimately obtained something better: a residence permit through a venture fund with capital appreciation potential. This is a straightforward case about making the right instrument choice. We explain how we redirected his capital and secured his status.

Dmitry NagyDmitry NagyInternational Tax Consultant, BRIDGESReading time8 min readVerificationReviewed by an expert

This case is based on a real matter. The name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

BRIDGES client story - How an Investor Redirected Capital from Real Estate into a Venture Fund and Obtained Portuguese Residence Permit
Contents

Case at a glance

Situation, solution and outcome in seven lines

Client
An investor with appetite for returns
Objective
Portuguese residence permit following real estate exclusion
Program
Portugal, Golden Visa (residence permit via investment fund, pathway to EU passport)
Key Considerations
Selection of a venture capital (VC) fund regulated by CMVM
Rationale
Capital appreciation instead of passive real estate
Solution
Subscription to a regulated venture fund
Outcome
Residence permit and a portfolio with growth potential

Client story

Client Background

Where they started

The client approached us with a typical recent request: he had previously planned to obtain a Golden Visa through real estate purchase, but as of 2023 this pathway was removed from the program. A new route to obtain a residence permit was needed, and initially the client perceived this as an unfortunate loss of the familiar option.

Why the standard route did not work

As we reviewed the remaining options, it became clear that the client's mindset was that of an investor, not a rentier. The idea of "buying an apartment and renting it out" appealed to him less than the opportunity to invest capital in something growing. The exclusion of real estate unexpectedly worked in his favor.

What BRIDGES had to solve

The main remaining pathway is a subscription of 500,000 euros minimum into an investment fund regulated by CMVM. Among such funds are venture capital funds: they invest in growing companies and carry greater risk, but also offer return potential that real estate does not promise. For a client with appetite for growth, this aligned better with his philosophy.

Why a standard answer would not do

The client came to BRIDGES to select a fund wisely: regulated, qualifying under the program, and with clear investment logic. The task was straightforward - not to rescue, but to properly allocate capital and secure his status.

I was planning to take an apartment under the golden visa, and they removed it from the program. At first I was upset, but then Dmitry showed me venture funds - and I realized it was actually more interesting. By nature I'm an investor; I prefer investing in something growing rather than renting out real estate. We selected a regulated venture fund, executed the subscription, and I obtained the residence permit. Now my capital isn't sitting in concrete but working with growth potential. Sometimes a closed door leads to something better.

Daniil · InvestorThe name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

Key Factors to Consider

Key Factors to Consider

There was no crisis here - rather a choice to be made. After real estate exclusion, it was critical not to grab the first available fund, but to select one that is regulated and appropriate to risk profile. A venture fund offers growth potential, but with higher volatility, so the choice must be made consciously, aligned with the investor's profile. The mistake here is not "losing everything," but investing thoughtlessly.

That real estate has been excluded from the program since 2023;

  1. 01That the fund must be CMVM-regulated and qualify under Golden Visa;
  2. 02The difference in risk and potential between fund types;
  3. 03Alignment of the venture fund with the client's profile;
  4. 04Minimum investment holding period required by the program.

The logic of the solution

How the matter progressed: from checks to result

The chart is built from the facts of this matter and shows the logic of the work without decorative or unverified data.

  1. 01
    Stage 1

    Reframed the situation after real estate was removed. First, we showed the client that real estate exclusion was not a dead end but a change of instrument. The remaining path through funds for an investor of this temperament suits even better, and this immediately shifted the mindset from "loss" to "choice."

  2. 02
    Stage 2

    Determined the client's investment profile. We discussed what the client wanted from capital: passive income or growth, what risk he was prepared to accept. It turned out that venture logic appealed to him more—investing in growing companies rather than real estate.

  3. 03
    Stage 3

    Selected regulated venture funds qualifying for Golden Visa. We identified venture capital (VC) funds regulated by CMVM and qualifying under the program, and compared them by strategy and risk. Residence permit eligibility was an absolute selection criterion.

  4. 04
    Stage 4

    Selected a fund matching the profile and completed subscription. From the selected options, we chose a fund suitable for the client's risk tolerance and logic, and completed a subscription of EUR 500,000. Capital was invested in a growth portfolio rather than a passive asset.

  5. 05
    Stage 5

    Applied for residence permit with venture fund investment. With the completed subscription, we submitted documents to AIMA. Investment in a regulated fund was clean and sufficient grounds, so the application proceeded smoothly.

Takeaway. Conclusion: after real estate was removed, the path through funds—including venture funds—for an investor with growth appetite is rather an opportunity than a loss. The main requirement for any fund is CMVM regulation and program qualification.

How we managed the case

How we managed the case

The work was split into verifiable stages so that every conclusion rested on documents.

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    Reframed the situation after real estate was removed. First, we showed the client that real estate exclusion was not a dead end but a change of instrument. The remaining path through funds for an investor of this temperament suits even better, and this immediately shifted the mindset from "loss" to "choice."

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    Determined the client's investment profile. We discussed what the client wanted from capital: passive income or growth, what risk he was prepared to accept. It turned out that venture logic appealed to him more—investing in growing companies rather than real estate.

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    Selected regulated venture funds qualifying for Golden Visa. We identified venture capital (VC) funds regulated by CMVM and qualifying under the program, and compared them by strategy and risk. Residence permit eligibility was an absolute selection criterion.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    Selected a fund matching the profile and completed subscription. From the selected options, we chose a fund suitable for the client's risk tolerance and logic, and completed a subscription of EUR 500,000. Capital was invested in a growth portfolio rather than a passive asset.

  5. 05

    Stage 5

    Applied for residence permit with venture fund investment. With the completed subscription, we submitted documents to AIMA. Investment in a regulated fund was clean and sufficient grounds, so the application proceeded smoothly.

  6. 06

    Stage 6

    Completed residence permit issuance with growth potential. The client received Portuguese residence permit, and his capital was deployed in a venture portfolio with income potential. The closed door to real estate turned into a more interesting instrument for him.

Expert comment

When real estate was removed from the program, concerned clients started coming to me: the familiar real estate option disappeared, and people thought everything became more complicated. But I see it differently. For an investor of this type, funds are an upgrade, not a downgrade. Especially venture funds: instead of freezing half a million in real estate and collecting rent, you invest capital in growing companies with income potential. Yes, risk is higher, so the choice must be made deliberately and according to profile. But one mandatory condition applies to all—the fund must be regulated by CMVM and qualify under the program, otherwise residence permit eligibility will not apply. This client initially came for an apartment but left with a venture portfolio and residence permit—and is far more satisfied than he would have been with real estate. Sometimes program restrictions become the better solution.

Dmitry Nagy, International Tax Consultant, BRIDGESDmitry NagyInternational Tax Consultant, BRIDGES

Outcome

What the client received

What was required
How we accomplished it · Result
Path without real estate
transition to investment funds · new route to residence permit
Account for profile
venture fund selection · capital with growth potential
Residence permit eligibility
fund under CMVM regulation · qualification for Golden Visa
Obtain status
application to AIMA · Portuguese residence permit
Obtain status
application to AIMA · Portuguese residence permit

What was: client planned Golden Visa through real estate, but it was excluded from the program, and a new path to residence permit was needed. What we did: reframed the situation as a change of instrument; determined investment profile; selected regulated venture funds; chose a fund matching the profile and completed subscription; applied and completed residence permit issuance. What the client received: Portuguese residence permit and capital in a venture portfolio with growth potential.

Practical takeaway

What matters in a similar situation

  • Conclusion: after real estate was removed, the path through funds—including venture funds—for an investor with growth appetite is rather an opportunity than a loss. The main requirement for any fund is CMVM regulation and program qualification.
  • The client received residence permit and a more interesting instrument for himself—because we changed not the goal but the method to achieve it, selecting a venture fund matching his profile.

FAQ

Questions people ask in a similar situation

01Is it possible to obtain Portuguese Golden Visa through a venture fund?

Yes. Following real estate exclusion, one of the main paths is subscription of EUR 500,000 to an investment fund under CMVM, including venture capital (VC) funds qualifying under the program.

02How does a venture fund differ from a standard fund for residence permit purposes?

A venture fund invests in growing companies: higher risk, but also potential returns. A conservative fund is more stable, but without such growth potential. Both must be regulated by CMVM.

03Why is real estate no longer suitable for Golden Visa?

Real estate has been excluded from the program since 2023. Current pathways include investment funds under CMVM supervision and other qualifying options.

04How to select a fund for Golden Visa?

By two criteria: the fund must be regulated by CMVM and qualify under the program, and its risk profile must align with your objectives—stability or growth.

05Does a venture fund guarantee returns?

No, venture investments carry risk and volatility—no one guarantees returns. However, with a successful strategy, a fund offers growth potential unavailable with passive assets.

06Want Portuguese residence permit and capital that works?

We will match you with a CMVM-regulated fund tailored to your profile—from conservative to venture—and process your Golden Visa, so EU status goes hand in hand with capital growth potential.

About the author

Dmitry Nagy

Author: Dmitry Nagy

International Tax Consultant, BRIDGES

I lead the international tax practice at BRIDGES and work at the intersection of tax residence, cross-border reporting and banking compliance. I assess how citizenship, residence, relocation or a new ownership structure may affect the client's tax obligations, banking profile and capital.

My work covers tax residence, CRS and FATCA requirements, source of funds and the questions a bank may raise. These elements should be considered together, because inconsistencies between documents, declarations and the underlying circumstances can create risks after a status has been obtained or an account has been opened.

During the consultation, you will receive an assessment of the tax and banking implications of the proposed decision. Where further work is required, I determine the financial documentation and personally oversee the tax and compliance aspects of the BRIDGES project.

Prepared on the basis of BRIDGES practice and reviewed by a subject-matter expert.

Discuss your situation with Dmitry

We will review your situation and propose a solution

Describe your task in a few words. We will study your situation, assess the legal and practical options and propose the next step based on your goals, documents and country.

Confidential · no obligations · answered by the relevant specialist

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Anna KovalevskayaHead of Legal, BRIDGES
Anna Kovalevskaya, Head of Legal, BRIDGES

Names and certain details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. The result described reflects one specific situation and is neither a public offer nor a guarantee of a similar outcome. Programme terms are stated as of 2026 and may change - please confirm current parameters with a BRIDGES consultant.