Updated

GL-C-05

Glossary · Banks and finance

Chargeback - reversing a card payment through your bank, not the seller

Full glossary
banksettles the dispute, not the seller
deadlineslimited by the card schemes’ rules
a sharea key risk indicator

01 / In 30 seconds

The short answer

What it is
A forced reversal of a card payment through the cardholder’s bank
Who starts it
The buyer, by going to their own bank rather than the seller
Typical reasons
Goods not received, service not provided, transaction not made
How it differs from a refund
A refund is made by the seller voluntarily; a chargeback is forced by the bank
What it means for a business
The sum is debited, a penalty, and a rising refund ratio up to closure of the account

02 / In plain words

What Chargeback means

A chargeback is a forced return of money on a card transaction, initiated not by the seller but by the cardholder’s bank. Put simply: the buyer goes not to the shop but to their own bank and disputes the charge, and the bank investigates and, if the claim is justified, takes the sum back from the seller.

It must not be confused with an ordinary refund: that is made by the seller voluntarily, by agreement with the customer. A chargeback is a dispute through the card scheme, with a formal procedure, deadlines and an obligation on the seller to prove that the goods were delivered or the service provided. The grounds vary: goods not received, a service not as described, a transaction not made by the cardholder.

For a business it means not only losing the sum but also a reputational indicator. Card schemes and banks have thresholds for the acceptable share of chargebacks: exceeding them leads to penalties, more expensive acquiring and closure of the merchant account. That is why it pays to resolve disputes directly with the customer before they go to the bank.

A case from practice

A client paid a foreign contractor for a service by card, the service was not provided, and the contractor did not answer emails. Going to their own bank with the correspondence and the contract attached made it possible to start a dispute and get the money back — through the procedure rather than negotiation.

When it concerns you

  • Paying by card for a service not provided
  • A charge you did not make
  • A dispute with a foreign seller
  • Accepting payments in your business
  • Assessing a company’s payment risks
  • Preparing for a bank check

03 / What it covers

How the dispute works

01

The buyer

  • Goes to their own bank
  • States the grounds
  • Keeps to the deadlines
02

Bank

  • Checks the justification
  • Requests documents from the seller
  • Takes a decision
03

The seller

  • Proves delivery
  • May challenge the decision
  • Bears the costs if it loses
04

Consequences

  • Card scheme penalties
  • Higher tariffs
  • Closure of the merchant account

04 / How it works

How the process works

Step 1

The buyer goes to their bank

A claim to the bank that issued the card, describing what happened.

Step 2

The bank checks the grounds

The bank checks whether the case fits the card scheme rules.

Step 3

Documents requested from the seller

The seller must prove the goods or service were provided.

Step 4

A decision on the dispute

The bank weighs the documents from both sides.

Step 5

Refund or rejection

The money is returned to the buyer or the claim is rejected.

05 / Key facts

What you need to know

01Who starts it

The cardholder, through their bank

The buyer disputes the charge with the bank that issued the card. The seller becomes the other party to the dispute.

02Grounds

Goods not received, service not provided

Or the service does not match its description, or the cardholder did not make the transaction.

03Difference from a refund

A refund is voluntary, a chargeback is not

The seller issues a refund itself. A chargeback follows card scheme rules, with deadlines and evidence.

04For a business

The chargeback ratio is a risk indicator

Exceeding the threshold leads to fines, costlier card acquiring and closure of the merchant account.

Common mistakes

Delaying the claim with your bank

File the dispute as early as possible: card scheme rules set time limits.

Going to the bank without evidence

Attach the contract, correspondence and proof the service was not provided.

For a seller - not keeping proof of delivery

Keep contracts, delivery records and correspondence to answer the bank on time.

For a seller - ignoring a customer complaint

Settle the dispute directly before the customer goes to the bank.

06 / Expert advice

Klara Rihter

How to prepare in advance

A business should keep evidence for each transaction: a description of the service, proof of delivery, correspondence with the customer, agreement to the terms. Customer complaints are answered quickly — most disputes are closed before they reach the bank. A buyer should remember the deadlines: the bank must be approached within the limits set by the card scheme’s rules.

What we do for you. We advise paying contractors abroad in such a way that you keep documents and a clear payment trail. This protects you both in a dispute and later — when a bank or a programme asks what the money was paid for.

Klara RihterBanking compliance and source of funds specialist

07 / Questions

Frequently asked questions

A refund is made by the seller voluntarily. A chargeback is a forced procedure through the cardholder’s bank, with deadlines and an investigation.

Go to the bank that issued your card with a description of the situation and supporting documents. The seller is the other party to the dispute in this process.

Yes, they are set by the card schemes’ rules and are limited. It is not worth delaying the claim.

No. The bank assesses the justification and both parties’ documents. If the seller proves that the service was provided, the refund will be refused.

The sum is debited, there is a penalty, and the chargeback ratio rises. Exceeding the acceptable ratio leads to more expensive acquiring or closure of the merchant account.

Answer customers quickly, keep proof of delivery, describe the terms clearly and resolve disputes before the customer goes to the bank.

Author: Klara Rihter

Reviewed by: Sergej Evdokimov

Sources: European Banking Authority

INITIAL ASSESSMENT

Tell us what outcome your family needs

We will design a solution for your case, choose the country and the right status, and take the whole process through to the result.

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Anna Kovalevskaya, lead lawyer at BRIDGES GLOBAL
Anna KovalevskayaLead lawyer, citizenship and residency, 12 years of practice