Updated: June 2026

Case study · Grenada · Citizenship by investment

How we unlocked funds from IT startupsale and obtained Grenada citizenship

Funds from IT startup sales are a legitimate, yet unfamiliar source for banks: the transaction is complex, the buyer is often foreign, the structure is convoluted, and banks frequently freeze assets pending clarification. Our client's funds were frozen for precisely this reason. We disclosed the transaction structure and unlocked the capital. Here's how the client verified the source and obtained Grenada citizenship.

Sergey EvdokimovSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGESReading time9 min readVerificationReviewed by an expert

This case is based on a real matter. The name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

BRIDGES client story - How we unlocked funds from IT startup sale and obtained Grenada citizenship
Contents

Case at a glance

Situation, solution and outcome in seven lines

Client
Founder who sold IT startup
Objective
Unblock funds and obtain Grenada citizenship
Program
Grenada, Citizenship by Investment
Challenge
Bank froze proceeds from startup sale
Requirements
Disclose transaction structure and source of funds
Solution
Startup sale dossier + buyer verification
Result
Funds unlocked, passport obtained

Client story

Client's story

Where they started

The client founded and developed an IT startup, then sold it. He planned to direct the proceeds, among other purposes, towards Grenada citizenship. However, the bank froze the funds from the startup sale, requiring verification of their source.

Why the standard route did not work

Such freezes are common precisely with technology transactions. A startup sale is not a simple transfer: complex transaction structure, often a foreign buyer, equity stakes, options, escrow, phased payments. For a bank, large sums with such a convoluted history triggers a freeze pending clarification, even if everything is entirely legitimate.

What BRIDGES had to solve

It is important to understand: the problem is not the legality of the funds, but rather the lack of transparency in the transaction for the bank. The capital is clean, the startup is real, the sale occurred—one merely needs to disclose the structure so the bank sees the complete picture: what the startup is, to whom it was sold, how the deal is structured, where the buyer's funds came from, how the money reached the client. A disclosed transaction removes the freeze.

Why a standard answer would not do

At BRIDGES, the client came to solve both tasks simultaneously: disclose the startup sale structure, unblock the funds, and use them to obtain Grenada citizenship.

I sold my IT startup, and the bank froze the funds—demanding I verify the source. The deal was complex: foreign buyer, equity stakes, escrow. Sergey and his team disclosed the entire structure: what the startup was, to whom it was sold, how the deal was structured, where the buyer's funds came from. The bank saw the complete picture, unblocked the funds, and I obtained Grenada citizenship. The money was legitimate—the startup sale simply needed to be presented to the bank transparently rather than hoping the bank would sort it out on its own.

Osnovatel · IT startup founderThe name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

What was at risk

What was at risk

The risk was not the legality of the funds, but rather getting stuck with frozen capital due to a transaction opaque to the bank. A startup sale is a complex structure, and without disclosure the bank keeps the funds frozen. The danger was banking on the freeze lifting automatically: the bank needs the complete transaction picture. The key was disclosing the sale structure transparently.

That the bank froze funds from the startup sale

  1. 01That the deal was complex: foreign buyer, equity stakes, escrow, phased payments
  2. 02That the freeze was due to lack of transparency, not illegality
  3. 03That the transaction structure and buyer's source needed to be disclosed
  4. 04That a disclosed transaction removes the freeze

The logic of the solution

How the matter progressed: from checks to result

The chart is built from the facts of this matter and shows the logic of the work without decorative or unverified data.

  1. 01
    Stage 1

    We identified the reason for the freeze. First, we established that the bank froze the funds not because they were illegal, but because of the lack of transparency in a complex transaction. This set our strategy—to disclose the entire sale structure.

  2. 02
    Stage 2

    We verified the startup and ownership. We gathered documents proving that the sold startup belonged to the client—to give the sale a clear starting point.

  3. 03
    Stage 3

    We disclosed the transaction structure. We broke down the complex transaction: to whom the startup was sold, how equity stakes, options, and escrow were arranged, phased payments. The structure that confused the bank became clear.

  4. 04
    Stage 4

    We verified the buyer's source of funds. We demonstrated where the buyer's money came from, so the chain would not end at "received from buyer," but would trace back to a legitimate source. This answered the bank's key question.

  5. 05
    Stage 5

    We demonstrated receipt of funds by the client. We disclosed the banking chain—how the proceeds from the sale reached the client, including escrow and payment stages. The bank saw the full path of the funds.

Takeaway. Conclusion: money from a startup sale is legal, but a complex transaction frightens the bank, and it freezes the funds. The freeze is lifted by disclosing the structure—startup, transaction, buyer's source, receipt of funds.

How we solved the problem

How we solved the problem

The work was split into verifiable stages so that every conclusion rested on documents.

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    We identified the reason for the freeze. First, we established that the bank froze the funds not because they were illegal, but because of the lack of transparency in a complex transaction. This set our strategy—to disclose the entire sale structure.

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    We verified the startup and ownership. We gathered documents proving that the sold startup belonged to the client—to give the sale a clear starting point.

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    We disclosed the transaction structure. We broke down the complex transaction: to whom the startup was sold, how equity stakes, options, and escrow were arranged, phased payments. The structure that confused the bank became clear.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    We verified the buyer's source of funds. We demonstrated where the buyer's money came from, so the chain would not end at "received from buyer," but would trace back to a legitimate source. This answered the bank's key question.

  5. 05

    Stage 5

    We demonstrated receipt of funds by the client. We disclosed the banking chain—how the proceeds from the sale reached the client, including escrow and payment stages. The bank saw the full path of the funds.

  6. 06

    Stage 6

    We unlocked the capital and obtained the passport. With the disclosed transaction, the bank lifted the freeze. Using the unlocked funds, the client obtained Grenada citizenship. The transparently disclosed startup sale resolved both objectives.

Expert comment

Funds freezing from startup sales is very common, and it is almost never about the legality of the funds, but about transaction complexity. Technology deals are intricate: foreign buyer, equity stakes, options, escrow, phased payments. For a bank, large sums with such a history are reason to freeze pending clarification, even when everything is legitimate. Clients often expect the freeze to lift on its own. It won't—the bank needs the full picture. I disclose such transactions layer by layer: here is the startup and proof it was yours, here is to whom and how it was sold, here is where the buyer's funds came from, here is how the money reached you through escrow and payment stages. With this client, everything was legal—we simply needed to show the sale transparently. We disclosed the structure, the bank unlocked the funds, and he obtained citizenship. With such freezes, there is one rule: disclose the entire transaction, rather than waiting for the bank to figure it out on its own.

Sergey Evdokimov, Managing Partner, BRIDGESSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGES

Outcome

What the client received

What was required
How we did it · Result
Lift the freeze
Transaction structure disclosure · Bank saw the full picture
Verify the startup
Ownership documents · Clear starting point
Buyer's source
Verification of funds origin · Chain does not break
Obtain the passport
Processing based on unlocked funds · Grenada citizenship
Obtain the passport
Processing based on unlocked funds · Grenada citizenship

What happened: the bank froze the client's funds from an IT startup sale, demanding verification of the complex transaction's source. What we did: identified the reason for the freeze; verified the startup and ownership; disclosed the transaction structure; verified the buyer's source of funds; demonstrated receipt of funds by the client; unlocked the capital and obtained the passport. What the client received: unlocked funds and Grenada citizenship.

Practical takeaway

What matters in a similar situation

  • Conclusion: money from a startup sale is legal, but a complex transaction frightens the bank, and it freezes the funds. The freeze is lifted by disclosing the structure—startup, transaction, buyer's source, receipt of funds.
  • The client unlocked the capital and obtained the passport—because we disclosed the entire startup sale structure, from company ownership to receipt of funds through escrow.

FAQ

Questions people ask in a similar situation

01Why does the bank freeze funds from a startup sale?

Due to transaction complexity, not illegality of the funds. A foreign buyer, equity stakes, escrow, and phased payments make the money trail opaque to the bank, and it freezes them pending clarification.

02How to unlock such funds?

Disclose the transaction structure: what startup, to whom it was sold, the source of the buyer's funds, and how the funds reached you. A transparently presented transaction removes the blocking.

03Is this a lawful source of funds?

Yes, the sale of your own startup is a lawful source. The issue is not legality but transparency for the bank; disclosing the transaction confirms the source.

04What documents are included in the startup sale file?

Documents proving startup ownership, the purchase agreement and transaction structure, confirmation of the buyer's source of funds, and the banking chain of fund receipt including escrow arrangements and transaction stages.

05What is the cost of Grenada citizenship?

A contribution to the National Transformation Fund from USD 235,000 or real estate from USD 270,000. Exact terms are confirmed with the authorized body.

06Has the bank frozen funds from business or startup sale?

We will disclose the transaction structure transparently—startup, agreement, buyer's source, fund receipt through escrow—to unfreeze the capital and obtain a Grenada passport based on it.

About the author

Sergey Evdokimov

Author: Sergey Evdokimov

Managing Partner, BRIDGES

As Founder and Managing Partner of BRIDGES, I am responsible for the firm's strategy and personally lead its most complex client matters, including cases in which citizenship or residence decisions require a strategic view and consideration of capital.

I begin by defining the objective: the outcome the client needs, the facts that affect the choice, and the matters that require further review. I then establish the available directions, the sequence of work, and the key decision points.

Once the strategy has been agreed, I oversee the BRIDGES team's key decisions and remain involved at the stages that shape the course of the matter. The purpose is to give the client a clear rationale for the chosen direction and a precise understanding of the next steps.

Prepared on the basis of BRIDGES practice and reviewed by a subject-matter expert.

Discuss your situation with Sergey

We will review your situation and propose a solution

Describe your task in a few words. We will study your situation, assess the legal and practical options and propose the next step based on your goals, documents and country.

Confidential · no obligations · answered by the relevant specialist

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Anna KovalevskayaHead of Legal, BRIDGES
Anna Kovalevskaya, Head of Legal, BRIDGES

Names and certain details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. The result described reflects one specific situation and is neither a public offer nor a guarantee of a similar outcome. Programme terms are stated as of 2026 and may change - please confirm current parameters with a BRIDGES consultant.