Updated

GL-O-04

Glossary · Taxes and residency

Offshore, onshore, midshore - how jurisdictions are classed and what matters today

Full glossary
3 categoriesa loose classification
bankthe main practical filter
reputationoutweighs the rate

01 / In 30 seconds

The short answer

Offshore
A jurisdiction with zero or very low tax and minimal requirements
Onshore
An ordinary country with full taxation and a good reputation
Midshore
An intermediate option: moderate taxes with a good reputation
What has changed
Substance requirements and exchange of information have eroded the former advantages of offshore jurisdictions
How to choose today
By access to banking and reputation, not by the rate alone

02 / In plain words

What Offshore / Onshore / Midshore means

The division into offshore, onshore and midshore is a loose classification of jurisdictions. An offshore jurisdiction is a country with zero or very low taxation, simple registration and minimal reporting requirements. An onshore jurisdiction is an ordinary country with a full tax system, developed regulation and a good reputation. A midshore jurisdiction is an intermediate option: a moderate tax burden with a decent reputation and working banking.

In recent years the boundary between the categories has blurred noticeably. Economic substance requirements, registers of beneficial owners, automatic exchange of tax information and CFC rules have removed most of the former advantages of classic offshore jurisdictions. At the same time, many reputable countries have introduced special regimes that make them competitive.

The practical criterion today has shifted. The main question is no longer “what is the rate there” but “will the company be able to open an account, and how will counterparties and reviewers view the jurisdiction”. A company in a country with a poor reputation may go for years without finding a bank — and no tax saving can make up for that. That is why the choice is made on the basis of access to banking and the business task.

A case from practice

A client was considering a classic offshore jurisdiction for its zero rate. It turned out that opening an account for such a company at the right bank was practically impossible. The choice shifted towards a jurisdiction with moderate taxes but working banking.

When this choice arises

  • Registering a company for business
  • A holding structure
  • Choosing a country for holding assets
  • Reviewing an old structure
  • Planning relocation
  • Assessing reputational risks

03 / What it covers

How the categories differ

01

Offshore

  • Zero or low tax
  • Simple registration
  • Difficulties with banks
02

Onshore

  • Full taxation
  • Developed regulation
  • Good reputation
03

Midshore

  • Moderate burden
  • Decent reputation
  • Working banking
04

What decides it

  • Access to an account
  • Counterparties’ attitude
  • Presence requirements

04 / How it works

How to choose a jurisdiction

Step 1

Define the business task

What the company is for: trading, holding, assets.

Step 2

Check access to banking

Which banks work with companies from that country.

Step 3

Assess the substance requirements

Office, director, staff - what the law requires.

Step 4

Calculate the effective burden

Company tax plus CFC and dividends at the owner's level.

Step 5

Make a decision

A jurisdiction that will satisfy the bank and checks.

05 / Key facts

What you need to know

01Offshore

Low tax, little reporting

Easy registration but a weak reputation. Many banks do not work with such companies.

02Onshore

A full tax system

Developed regulation and a good reputation, higher tax. Some countries offer special regimes.

03Midshore

The middle ground

Moderate tax with a decent reputation and working banking.

04What decides now

Bank and substance

Substance rules, beneficial owner registers and automatic data exchange removed the old benefits. The main question is whether an account will be opened.

Common mistakes

Choosing a jurisdiction by tax rate

Start with bank access and reputation, then calculate taxes.

Treating an offshore as a way to hide ownership

Assume transparency: beneficial owners are disclosed to registers and banks.

Following decade-old advice

Check the current substance, CFC and information-exchange rules.

06 / Expert advice

Dmitry Nagy

How to prepare in advance

Start with the business task: where the clients are, where an account is needed, what activity is carried on. Then check the banking reality of the chosen jurisdiction — this is the toughest filter. Only after that are taxes calculated, and the effective burden at that, taking into account substance and the rules of your country of residence.

What we do for you. We select a jurisdiction based on practice: where an account will actually be opened, how counterparties will view it, what will be required in terms of substance. The tax rate is the last criterion on this list, not the first.

Dmitry NagyTax consultant, international taxation and compliance (ex-Big4)

07 / Questions

Frequently asked questions

A loose term for a jurisdiction with zero or very low taxation, simple registration and minimal reporting.

It is an intermediate option: a moderate tax burden with a decent reputation and accessible banking services.

Registering a company as such is lawful. The question is whether it has a business purpose, whether substance requirements are met and whether the income is declared.

Because of economic substance requirements, registers of beneficial owners, automatic exchange of information, CFC rules and refusals by banks.

On the basis of the business task and access to banking. The rate matters, but it is useless if the company cannot open an account.

No. Registers of beneficial owners and automatic exchange of information make ownership visible to regulators and banks.

Author: Dmitry Nagy

Reviewed by: Sergej Evdokimov

Sources: OECD — on transparency and exchange of information

INITIAL ASSESSMENT

Tell us what outcome your family needs

We will design a solution for your case, choose the country and the right status, and take the whole process through to the result.

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Anna Kovalevskaya, lead lawyer at BRIDGES GLOBAL
Anna KovalevskayaLead lawyer, citizenship and residency, 12 years of practice