Updated: June 2026

Case study · Saint Kitts and Nevis · Citizenship by investment

How We Unraveled Trusts Across Three Jurisdictionsand Verified the Source of Funds for Saint Kitts

A single trust under review is already complex; trusts spread across three jurisdictions represent a multi-layered structure that strict Saint Kitts due diligence will not approve without complete clarity. Our client's capital was precisely this type. We unraveled the structure completely. Here's how multi-jurisdictional trusts transformed into a verified source of funds.

Sergey EvdokimovSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGESReading time9 min readVerificationReviewed by an expert

This case is based on a real matter. The name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

BRIDGES client story - How We Unraveled Trusts Across Three Jurisdictions and Verified the Source of Funds for Saint Kitts
Contents

Case at a glance

Situation, solution and outcome in seven lines

Client
Beneficiary of Trusts in Three Jurisdictions
Objective
Verify source of funds under strict due diligence review
Program
Saint Kitts and Nevis, Citizenship by Investment
Complexity
Multi-layered trust structure across 3 countries
Requirements
Unravel the structure and asset origin
Solution
Layer-by-layer disclosure of each trust and interconnections
Outcome
Source verified, passport obtained

Client story

Client's Story

Where they started

The client's capital was structured through trusts across three jurisdictions—a lawful but complex method of managing and protecting family wealth. For strict Saint Kitts due diligence, such a structure is not one layer but multi-layered: funds do not flow directly from the individual but through several interconnected trusts in different countries.

Why the standard route did not work

Complexity increases with each jurisdiction. Each trust has its own settlor, trustee, beneficiaries, assets, and applicable law; between them exist connections and fund flows. Saint Kitts' strictest due diligence does not accept the word "trusts" at face value—it demands to see the entire construction transparently: who established what, what funds capitalize each trust, how they are connected, the client's relationship to each, and the basis for distributions.

What BRIDGES had to solve

Therefore, we unraveled the structure layer by layer. For each of the three trusts, we disclosed the settlor, source of assets, the client's role as beneficiary, and grounds for distributions; we showed the connections between trusts across jurisdictions and the complete fund flow to the client. Essentially, we transformed a convoluted multi-jurisdictional construction into a transparent, traceable chain—one that even the strictest due diligence review could see as lawfully sourced without a single dark corner.

Why a standard answer would not do

The client came to BRIDGES with this complex challenge: pass Saint Kitts' strictest due diligence with capital held in trusts across three jurisdictions—by completely unraveling the structure and verifying the source of funds end-to-end.

My capital is held in trusts across three jurisdictions, and I understood that for strict Saint Kitts due diligence, simply saying "trusts" would not suffice. Dmitry unraveled everything layer by layer: for each trust—who established it, what comprises the assets, how I am connected as beneficiary, on what grounds distributions flow, and how the trusts interrelate. A convoluted structure became a transparent chain leading to me. The strictest due diligence identified a lawful source with no hidden corners, and I was approved. With multi-jurisdictional trusts, there is no other way—you must unravel everything completely.

Benefitsiar · Trust BeneficiaryThe name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

What Was at Risk

What Was at Risk

The risk lay not in the lawfulness of the capital but in the multi-layered nature of the structure: trusts across three jurisdictions faced strictest due diligence, and without complete unraveling, the source could not be verified. The key was to disclose each trust, the connections between them, and the complete fund flow to the client.

That capital was structured through trusts in three jurisdictions;

  1. 01That this is a multi-layered structure, not a single trust;
  2. 02That each trust has its own settlor, assets, applicable law, and beneficiaries;
  3. 03That strict due diligence demands transparent visibility of the entire construction;
  4. 04That trust connections and the complete fund flow must be disclosed.

The logic of the solution

How the matter progressed: from checks to result

The chart is built from the facts of this matter and shows the logic of the work without decorative or unverified data.

  1. 01
    Stage 1

    We assessed the multi-layered nature of the structure. First, we established: this is not one trust, but trusts in three jurisdictions, and rigorous verification requires seeing the entire structure transparently. This determined our layer-by-layer disclosure strategy.

  2. 02
    Stage 2

    We disclosed the establishment of each trust. We provided founding documents for each trust - who established it and where, how it is structured - so no jurisdiction remained a "black box."

  3. 03
    Stage 3

    We verified the source of trust assets. We demonstrated the legitimate source of funding for each trust, ensuring the capital in any jurisdiction has clean origins.

  4. 04
    Stage 4

    We disclosed the interconnections between trusts. We revealed how the trusts in three jurisdictions are connected and how funds flow - making the multi-layered structure understandable rather than confusing.

  5. 05
    Stage 5

    We disclosed the client's role and distributions. We confirmed the client's role as beneficiary under each trust and the basis for distributions, completing the end-to-end fund flow pathway.

Takeaway. Conclusion: trusts in three jurisdictions represent a multi-layered structure that strict verification will not approve without complete clarity. Source is verified through layer-by-layer unraveling of each trust, their interconnections, and the complete fund flow pathway.

How we resolved the matter

How we resolved the matter

The work was split into verifiable stages so that every conclusion rested on documents.

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    We assessed the multi-layered nature of the structure. First, we established: this is not one trust, but trusts in three jurisdictions, and rigorous verification requires seeing the entire structure transparently. This determined our layer-by-layer disclosure strategy.

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    We disclosed the establishment of each trust. We provided founding documents for each trust - who established it and where, how it is structured - so no jurisdiction remained a "black box."

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    We verified the source of trust assets. We demonstrated the legitimate source of funding for each trust, ensuring the capital in any jurisdiction has clean origins.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    We disclosed the interconnections between trusts. We revealed how the trusts in three jurisdictions are connected and how funds flow - making the multi-layered structure understandable rather than confusing.

  5. 05

    Stage 5

    We disclosed the client's role and distributions. We confirmed the client's role as beneficiary under each trust and the basis for distributions, completing the end-to-end fund flow pathway.

  6. 06

    Stage 6

    We passed rigorous due diligence and obtained the passport. With the structure fully unraveled, Saint Kitts' strictest verification process identified a legitimate source with no hidden aspects, and the client obtained citizenship. Multi-jurisdictional trusts passed verification due to complete unraveling.

Expert comment

Trusts always add an additional verification layer, and when there are three of them across different jurisdictions, it becomes a multi-layered structure where you cannot cut corners with a strict program like Saint Kitts. I explain to clients: verification is not satisfied with hearing "my capital is in trusts." Each trust has its own settlor, trustee, beneficiaries, assets, and applicable law, with relationships and fund flows between them. Strictest due diligence requires seeing the entire structure transparently. That is why I unravel it layer by layer: for each of the three trusts - who established it, what funds it holds, how the client is connected as beneficiary, on what grounds distributions are made; and crucially - how the trusts are interconnected and what the complete fund flow pathway to the client is. A complex multi-jurisdictional structure must become a transparent, traceable chain with no hidden corners. This is what we did with this client - we unraveled everything completely, and the strictest verification saw a legitimate source. With such structures, there is one rule: unravel completely, jurisdiction by jurisdiction.

Sergey Evdokimov, Managing Partner, BRIDGESSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGES

Outcome

What the client received

What was required
How we did it · Result
Verify the source
Layer-by-layer unraveling of structure · Transparent chain
Disclose each trust
Settlor, assets, applicable law · No "black boxes"
Demonstrate interconnections
Structure of jurisdiction relationships · Multi-layered nature understood
Pass rigorous due diligence
Complete fund flow pathway to client · Saint Kitts and Nevis citizenship
Pass rigorous due diligence
Complete fund flow pathway to client · Saint Kitts and Nevis citizenship

What was the situation: the client's capital was structured through trusts in three jurisdictions, and Saint Kitts verification is among the strictest. What we did: assessed the multi-layered structure; disclosed the establishment of each trust; verified the source of trust assets; demonstrated interconnections between trusts; disclosed the client's role and distributions; passed rigorous due diligence and obtained the passport. What the client received: verified source and Saint Kitts and Nevis citizenship.

Practical takeaway

What matters in a similar situation

  • Conclusion: trusts in three jurisdictions represent a multi-layered structure that strict verification will not approve without complete clarity. Source is verified through layer-by-layer unraveling of each trust, their interconnections, and the complete fund flow pathway.
  • The client verified the source and obtained the passport - because we unraveled the three-jurisdiction trusts completely, transforming a complex structure into a transparent chain to the beneficiary.

FAQ

Questions people ask in a similar situation

01Can one pass verification with capital in multiple trusts?

Yes, if the structure is completely unraveled. Trusts in multiple jurisdictions represent a multi-layered structure, and Saint Kitts' strict verification requires disclosure of each trust, relationships between them, and the complete fund flow pathway.

02Why are trusts in different jurisdictions more complex for verification?

Because each trust has its own settlor, assets, beneficiaries, and applicable law, with interconnections between them. This is a multi-layered structure, and the review authority wants to see the entire construction transparently, not just the word "trusts."

03What does unraveling a trust structure entail?

For each trust: founding documents, source of assets, the client's role as beneficiary and basis for distributions; as well as connections between trusts in different jurisdictions and the complete fund flow pathway to the client.

04Is it sufficient to merely state that capital is held in trusts?

No, particularly in a stringent program. Full layer-by-layer disclosure is required, converting a complex multi-jurisdictional structure into a transparent, traceable chain without any opaque elements.

05What is the cost of Saint Kitts citizenship?

Non-refundable SISC contribution from USD 250,000 for a family of up to four persons, or real property from USD 325,000 or USD 600,000. Exact terms are to be confirmed with the competent authority.

06Is your capital structured through trusts in different jurisdictions?

We will unravel the complex multi-layered trust structure completely—for each trust: settlor, assets, beneficiary role, and inter-jurisdictional connections—so the most rigorous Saint Kitts review sees the legitimate fund source without any gaps.

About the author

Sergey Evdokimov

Author: Sergey Evdokimov

Managing Partner, BRIDGES

As Founder and Managing Partner of BRIDGES, I am responsible for the firm's strategy and personally lead its most complex client matters, including cases in which citizenship or residence decisions require a strategic view and consideration of capital.

I begin by defining the objective: the outcome the client needs, the facts that affect the choice, and the matters that require further review. I then establish the available directions, the sequence of work, and the key decision points.

Once the strategy has been agreed, I oversee the BRIDGES team's key decisions and remain involved at the stages that shape the course of the matter. The purpose is to give the client a clear rationale for the chosen direction and a precise understanding of the next steps.

Prepared on the basis of BRIDGES practice and reviewed by a subject-matter expert.

Discuss your situation with Sergey

We will review your situation and propose a solution

Describe your task in a few words. We will study your situation, assess the legal and practical options and propose the next step based on your goals, documents and country.

Confidential · no obligations · answered by the relevant specialist

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Anna KovalevskayaHead of Legal, BRIDGES
Anna Kovalevskaya, Head of Legal, BRIDGES

Names and certain details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. The result described reflects one specific situation and is neither a public offer nor a guarantee of a similar outcome. Programme terms are stated as of 2026 and may change - please confirm current parameters with a BRIDGES consultant.