Offices
+36 70 421 32 63

Updated: June 2026

Case study · Malta · Tax

How a Trader with Multi-Million Euro Income Reduced Personal Taxes Through Malta's Fixed GRP Tax

The higher the income, the more expensive progressive taxation becomes: from millions of euros, it claims nearly half. Eduard's personal annual income from stock trading and venture investments is measured in millions, and in the CIS or a typical European country, he would fall under tax rates up to 45%. We explain how Malta's GRP status with fixed taxation and non-dom regime reduced his personal tax burden on worldwide income to a reasonable minimum.

Sergey EvdokimovSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGESReading time10 min readVerificationReviewed by an expert

This case is based on a real matter. The name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

BRIDGES client story - How a Trader with Multi-Million Euro Income Reduced Personal Taxes Through Malta's Fixed GRP Tax
Contents

Case at a glance

Situation, solution and outcome in seven lines

Client
Eduard, 41, a private trader and venture investor, from Yekaterinburg
Origin
Relocation from CIS
Program
Malta, Global Residence Programme
Income
Millions of euros annually from stock trading and venture investments
Risk
Progressive taxes up to 45%
Solution
GRP, fixed tax, non-dom regime
Result
Personal tax burden on worldwide income reduced to minimum

Client story

Client Story

Where they started

Eduard earns on financial markets: active stock trading, participation in venture deals, project exits. His income is not tied to a single country and measures in millions of euros annually—but this very fact makes him especially vulnerable to taxation.

Why the standard route did not work

In his home country and in most EU countries popular with investors, such income would be taxed under progressive rates—up to 45%. Over several years, this means surrendering nearly half of earnings, despite markets offering no guarantees of stability.

What BRIDGES had to solve

Eduard was not seeking an offshore solution or a gray-area scheme—he understood that working with brokers and banks requires a respected, transparent jurisdiction. Ideally, English-speaking, within the EU, with clear rules and predictable, preferably fixed, tax burden.

Why a standard answer would not do

He came to BRIDGES to establish a personal tax status that, despite multi-million worldwide income, would provide not intimidating progression but clear and low effective rates—while remaining audit-proof.

Giving almost half to a progressive tax was too much. Yan arranged a Maltese status with a flat tax and laid out my income so that I can explain the scheme myself in two minutes.

Eduard · trader and venture investorThe name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

What Was at Risk

What Was at Risk

Progressive taxation is structured to penalize success: the higher the income, the greater the share claimed by taxes. For a trader with multi-million and volatile income, this is especially painful—in a successful year, nearly half is surrendered.

Progressive personal income tax up to 45% on trading and venture returns

  1. 01Rising tax percentage as income increases in successful years
  2. 02Risk of tax claims on worldwide income from country of origin
  3. 03Temptation to move offshore and lose access to EU brokers and banks
  4. 04Lack of predictability—impossible to plan taxes in advance

The logic of the solution

How the matter progressed: from checks to result

The chart is built from the facts of this matter and shows the logic of the work without decorative or unverified data.

  1. 01
    Stage 1

    We analyzed Eduard's income structure - stock trading, venture deals, exits - and determined what qualifies as foreign income and capital gains.

  2. 02
    Stage 2

    We established GRP status with minimum fixed tax: qualified residence, insurance, resources, fit and proper assessment.

  3. 03
    Stage 3

    We locked in non-domiciled status and allocated income streams: funds for living on the island are taxed at 15%, the rest remains in the foreign circuit.

  4. 04
    Stage 4

    We confirmed exemption of foreign capital gains from Maltese tax.

  5. 05
    Stage 5

    We ensured compliance with the 183-day rule and genuine ties to the island, so the country of origin cannot claim worldwide income.

Takeaway. The more successful the market year, the more pronounced the benefit: the effective rate at multi-million income becomes minimal. At the same time, the status is completely legitimate - EU brokers and banks work with Malta residents without issues, unlike offshore structures.

How we solved the challenge

How we solved the challenge

The work was split into verifiable stages so that every conclusion rested on documents.

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    We analyzed Eduard's income structure - stock trading, venture deals, exits - and determined what qualifies as foreign income and capital gains.

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    We established GRP status with minimum fixed tax: qualified residence, insurance, resources, fit and proper assessment.

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    We locked in non-domiciled status and allocated income streams: funds for living on the island are taxed at 15%, the rest remains in the foreign circuit.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    We confirmed exemption of foreign capital gains from Maltese tax.

  5. 05

    Stage 5

    We ensured compliance with the 183-day rule and genuine ties to the island, so the country of origin cannot claim worldwide income.

  6. 06

    Stage 6

    We prepared annual compliance guidelines: what and how to declare, which amounts to bring in and how to document the origin of funds.

Expert comment

Progressive tax scale is the worst enemy for a person with high and volatile income: in a successful year it takes nearly half, returning nothing in a bad year. The Maltese model for a trader is opposite in logic: fixed tax plus non-dom means the more you earn globally, the lower your effective rate. This is completely legal and works only with genuine status. We gave Eduard predictability - something always lacking in the markets.

Sergey Evdokimov, Managing Partner, BRIDGESSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGES

Outcome

What the client received

Indicator
Before · After
Personal income tax scale
Up to 45% progressive · Fixed minimum
Foreign income
Was taxed · Non-dom: 15% upon importation
Foreign capital gains
Was taxed · 0%
Tax predictability
Low · High
Tax predictability
Low · High

After establishing the status, Eduard's personal tax burden on worldwide income no longer depends on progression: instead of a rate up to 45% - fixed minimum tax and non-dom regime where foreign income is taxed only upon importation, and foreign capital gains are not taxed at all.

Practical takeaway

What matters in a similar situation

  • The more successful the market year, the more pronounced the benefit: the effective rate at multi-million income becomes minimal. At the same time, the status is completely legitimate - EU brokers and banks work with Malta residents without issues, unlike offshore structures.
  • The case demonstrates that for a high-income individual, jurisdiction choice is not about nominal rates, but about the taxation model. Fixed tax combined with non-dom transforms success from tax penalty into predictable and low burden.
  • GRP status with the non-dom regime minimises a trader’s personal tax burden on worldwide income. We will look at your case.

FAQ

Questions people ask in a similar situation

01What is fixed tax in GRP?

The status provides for a minimum fixed annual tax. Foreign income is taxed on the non-dom principle - only on the portion brought to the island, at 15% rate.

02Is trading profit subject to taxation?

Foreign income is taxed only upon importation to the island; foreign capital gains under non-dom status are not taxed. Applicability depends on the income structure.

03Why does the benefit increase with income?

The tax is fixed, not progressive: the higher the worldwide income, the lower the effective tax rate relative to it.

04Is this legal?

Yes, this is a standard regime under Maltese tax law. Real status, compliance with regulations, and proper tax reporting are required.

05Will brokers and banks cooperate?

Yes, Malta resident status is a transparent status within the EU, with which brokers and banks work willingly, unlike offshore structures.

06Which documents were key in this case?

We analyzed Eduard's income structure - stock trading, venture deals, exits - and determined what qualifies as foreign income and capital gains. We established GRP status with minimum fixed tax: qualified residence, insurance, resources, fit and proper assessment.

07Why did the standard route not suit the client?

In his home country and in most EU countries popular with investors, such income would be taxed under progressive rates—up to 45%. Over several years, this means surrendering nearly half of earnings, despite markets offering no guarantees of stability.

08What risk had to be closed before filing?

Progressive taxation is structured to penalize success: the higher the income, the greater the share claimed by taxes. For a trader with multi-million and volatile income, this is especially painful—in a successful year, nearly half is surrendered. Progressive personal income tax up to 45% on trading and venture returns

09How did BRIDGES check that the chosen solution would hold?

We ensured compliance with the 183-day rule and genuine ties to the island, so the country of origin cannot claim worldwide income. We prepared annual compliance guidelines: what and how to declare, which amounts to bring in and how to document the origin of funds.

10What confirmed the result in the end?

After establishing the status, Eduard's personal tax burden on worldwide income no longer depends on progression: instead of a rate up to 45% - fixed minimum tax and non-dom regime where foreign income is taxed only upon importation, and foreign capital gains are not taxed at all. Indicator: Before · After. Personal income tax scale: Up to 45% progressive · Fixed minimum. Foreign income: Was taxed · Non-dom: 15% upon importation. Foreign capital gains: Was taxed · 0%. Tax predictability: Low · High. Tax predictability: Low · High

About the author

Sergey Evdokimov

Author: Sergey Evdokimov

Managing Partner, BRIDGES

As Founder and Managing Partner of BRIDGES, I am responsible for the firm's strategy and personally lead its most complex client matters, including cases in which citizenship or residence decisions require a strategic view and consideration of capital.

I begin by defining the objective: the outcome the client needs, the facts that affect the choice, and the matters that require further review. I then establish the available directions, the sequence of work, and the key decision points.

Once the strategy has been agreed, I oversee the BRIDGES team's key decisions and remain involved at the stages that shape the course of the matter. The purpose is to give the client a clear rationale for the chosen direction and a precise understanding of the next steps.

Prepared on the basis of BRIDGES practice and reviewed by a subject-matter expert.

Discuss your situation with Sergey

We will review your situation and propose a solution

Describe your task in a few words. We will study your situation, assess the legal and practical options and propose the next step based on your goals, documents and country.

Confidential · no obligations · answered by the relevant specialist

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Dmitry NagyInternational Tax Consultant, BRIDGES
Dmitry Nagy, International Tax Consultant, BRIDGES

Names and certain details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. The result described reflects one specific situation and is neither a public offer nor a guarantee of a similar outcome. Programme terms are stated as of 2026 and may change - please confirm current parameters with a BRIDGES consultant.