Updated: June 2026

Case study · Egypt · Citizenship

How a Client from Libya Obtained Egyptian CitizenshipThrough a Returnable Deposit, Recovering Funds

Sometimes a client needs two things simultaneously: to obtain a passport but not lose invested funds, while also undergoing enhanced source of funds verification. Our client from Libya wanted exactly this. The returnable deposit provided him with a passport and funds return, while thorough due diligence ensured clean compliance. We explain how we combined both objectives.

Sergey EvdokimovSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGESReading time9 min readVerificationReviewed by an expert

This case is based on a real matter. The name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

BRIDGES client story - How a Client from Libya Obtained Egyptian Citizenship Through a Returnable Deposit, Recovering Funds
Contents

Case at a glance

Situation, solution and outcome in seven lines

Client
Entrepreneur from Libya
Objective
Egyptian Passport Without Loss of Funds
Program
Egypt, Citizenship by Investment
Key Considerations
Funds Return + Enhanced Source Verification
Option
Returnable Deposit from $500,000 USD in Bank for Fixed Term
Solution
Deposit + Comprehensive Due Diligence on Source of Funds
Result
Passport Obtained, Funds to be Returned After Term Expiration

Client story

Client's Story

Where they started

The client—an entrepreneur from Libya—sought a second Egyptian passport with one important condition: not to lose invested funds. Non-refundable contribution did not suit him; he sought an option where funds would eventually be returned.

Why the standard route did not work

Egyptian citizenship offers such an option: a returnable bank deposit from $500,000 USD, which is placed for a specified term and then returned to the client. This provided exactly what was needed: a passport now and funds back later, unlike non-refundable contribution.

What BRIDGES had to solve

The second complexity involved source of funds. Capital from jurisdictions such as Libya undergoes enhanced due diligence—this is a regional context matter, not a personal assessment. Surface-level confirmation is insufficient: the source of funds must be disclosed at document level, otherwise even a returnable deposit becomes stuck in compliance review.

Why a standard answer would not do

At BRIDGES, the client came to combine two objectives: select an option with funds return and simultaneously prepare comprehensive due diligence on the source to ensure the enhanced verification for Libyan capital proceeds smoothly.

A passport was important to me, but I did not want to lose funds, and I knew that verification from Libya would be stricter. Igor proposed a returnable deposit: funds are placed for a term and then returned—I receive the passport while preserving the capital. We immediately approached the source of funds thoroughly and compiled complete due diligence. We passed enhanced verification smoothly, I received the passport, and funds will be returned after the term. We solved both tasks at once.

Dmitry · Entrepreneur from LibyaThe name and certain identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality.

What Was at Risk

What Was at Risk

Two tasks were at stake simultaneously: not to lose funds and to pass enhanced source of funds verification. Non-refundable contribution did not meet the first requirement, while superficial due diligence would have failed the second—capital from Libya undergoes deeper scrutiny. The key was to select an option with funds return and simultaneously disclose the source at document level.

That the client did not want to lose invested funds

  1. 01That the returnable deposit is placed for a fixed term and then returned
  2. 02That capital from Libya undergoes enhanced due diligence
  3. 03That source of funds must be disclosed at document level
  4. 04That superficial due diligence would become stuck in compliance review

The logic of the solution

How the matter progressed: from checks to result

The chart is built from the facts of this matter and shows the logic of the work without decorative or unverified data.

  1. 01
    Stage 1

    We addressed both client requirements. First, we identified two objectives: return the funds and pass enhanced due diligence. This determined both the option selection and the depth of work on the source of funds.

  2. 02
    Stage 2

    We selected a returnable deposit. For the requirement "not to lose funds," we opted for a returnable bank deposit from USD 500,000: funds are placed for a fixed term and then returned to the client, unlike a non-refundable contribution.

  3. 03
    Stage 3

    We considered the enhanced due diligence context. We explained to the client that capital from Libya is subject to deeper scrutiny, which relates to the jurisdiction rather than to him personally. This determined the level of work on the source—comprehensive rather than superficial.

  4. 04
    Stage 4

    We disclosed the source of funds to document level. We compiled documentation on the origin of the client's capital: how it was earned, with confirmation of business activities and fund transfers. Superficial verification is insufficient under enhanced compliance.

  5. 05
    Stage 5

    We agreed on the deposit and passed due diligence. By providing a complete source file in advance, we placed the deposit and passed enhanced due diligence without delays. Fund return was built into the option terms.

Takeaway. Conclusion: a returnable deposit provides citizenship without loss of funds, but capital from jurisdictions like Libya requires enhanced due diligence—source is disclosed to document level. Both tasks are solved simultaneously.

How we solved the task

How we solved the task

The work was split into verifiable stages so that every conclusion rested on documents.

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    We addressed both client requirements. First, we identified two objectives: return the funds and pass enhanced due diligence. This determined both the option selection and the depth of work on the source of funds.

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    We selected a returnable deposit. For the requirement "not to lose funds," we opted for a returnable bank deposit from USD 500,000: funds are placed for a fixed term and then returned to the client, unlike a non-refundable contribution.

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    We considered the enhanced due diligence context. We explained to the client that capital from Libya is subject to deeper scrutiny, which relates to the jurisdiction rather than to him personally. This determined the level of work on the source—comprehensive rather than superficial.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    We disclosed the source of funds to document level. We compiled documentation on the origin of the client's capital: how it was earned, with confirmation of business activities and fund transfers. Superficial verification is insufficient under enhanced compliance.

  5. 05

    Stage 5

    We agreed on the deposit and passed due diligence. By providing a complete source file in advance, we placed the deposit and passed enhanced due diligence without delays. Fund return was built into the option terms.

  6. 06

    Stage 6

    We brought it through to passport issuance. The client obtained Egyptian citizenship by placing a returnable deposit. The funds will be returned to him after the specified term, and enhanced due diligence on Libyan capital was completed due to the completeness of the file.

Expert comment

This case demonstrates how to reconcile two seemingly different requirements. The client from Libya wanted a passport but did not want to lose funds—meaning a non-refundable contribution was ruled out. A returnable deposit comes to the rescue: a substantial sum is placed in a bank for a term and then returned. You get the passport and don't lose your funds. But there was a second aspect—the source of funds. Capital from Libya, like from several other jurisdictions, is subject to enhanced scrutiny, and this relates to the region, not the individual. One cannot pass superficially here—the source must be disclosed to document level. We did both: selected the returnable option and compiled a comprehensive file on the origin of funds. As a result, the client obtained both the passport and the return of his funds, and enhanced compliance was completed smoothly. When there are two tasks, both must be solved simultaneously, not one at the expense of the other.

Sergey Evdokimov, Managing Partner, BRIDGESSergey EvdokimovManaging Partner, BRIDGES

Outcome

What the client received

What was required
How we did it · Result
Not to lose funds
Returnable deposit from USD 500,000 · Funds returned after the term
Pass enhanced due diligence
Source to document level · Comprehensive file
Combine both tasks
Deposit plus complete file · Passport without loss of funds
Obtain a passport
Deposit placement · Egyptian citizenship
Obtain a passport
Deposit placement · Egyptian citizenship

What was the situation: a client from Libya wanted Egyptian citizenship without losing funds, and his capital was subject to enhanced due diligence. What we did: addressed both requirements; selected a returnable deposit; considered the enhanced due diligence context; disclosed source of funds to document level; agreed on the deposit and passed due diligence; completed passport issuance. What the client received: Egyptian citizenship, return of funds after the term, and completed compliance.

Practical takeaway

What matters in a similar situation

  • Conclusion: a returnable deposit provides citizenship without loss of funds, but capital from jurisdictions like Libya requires enhanced due diligence—source is disclosed to document level. Both tasks are solved simultaneously.
  • The client obtained a passport while preserving funds and passing enhanced due diligence—because we combined a returnable deposit with a comprehensive source file.

FAQ

Questions people ask in a similar situation

01Can one obtain Egyptian citizenship without losing funds?

Yes, through a returnable bank deposit from USD 500,000: funds are placed for a fixed term set by the program and are returned to the client upon expiration, unlike a non-refundable contribution.

02How does a returnable deposit work?

A substantial sum is placed in a bank for a fixed term set by the program and is returned upon expiration. A passport is issued based on this placement. Terms and conditions are clarified with the authorized body.

03Why is capital from Libya subject to enhanced due diligence?

This is a jurisdictional context, not a personal assessment: the origin of funds from certain regions is examined more thoroughly. Therefore, the source must be disclosed down to the document level.

04What is included in the source of funds file?

Documents on capital origin: how it was earned, confirmation of business activity and fund movements. Under enhanced due diligence, the depth of disclosure is higher than standard.

05Can fund repatriation and compliance be combined?

Yes. A returnable deposit addresses the funds issue, while a comprehensive source of funds file addresses the compliance verification. Both objectives are achieved together, not one at the expense of the other.

06Want a passport without losing money and with clean compliance?

We will select a returnable deposit option so funds are returned after the period, and compile a comprehensive source of funds file for enhanced compliance - so you obtain Egyptian citizenship while preserving your capital.

About the author

Sergey Evdokimov

Author: Sergey Evdokimov

Managing Partner, BRIDGES

As Founder and Managing Partner of BRIDGES, I am responsible for the firm's strategy and personally lead its most complex client matters, including cases in which citizenship or residence decisions require a strategic view and consideration of capital.

I begin by defining the objective: the outcome the client needs, the facts that affect the choice, and the matters that require further review. I then establish the available directions, the sequence of work, and the key decision points.

Once the strategy has been agreed, I oversee the BRIDGES team's key decisions and remain involved at the stages that shape the course of the matter. The purpose is to give the client a clear rationale for the chosen direction and a precise understanding of the next steps.

Prepared on the basis of BRIDGES practice and reviewed by a subject-matter expert.

Discuss your situation with Sergey

We will review your situation and propose a solution

Describe your task in a few words. We will study your situation, assess the legal and practical options and propose the next step based on your goals, documents and country.

Confidential · no obligations · answered by the relevant specialist

Or message us on WhatsApp or Telegram

Anna KovalevskayaHead of Legal, BRIDGES
Anna Kovalevskaya, Head of Legal, BRIDGES

Names and certain details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. The result described reflects one specific situation and is neither a public offer nor a guarantee of a similar outcome. Programme terms are stated as of 2026 and may change - please confirm current parameters with a BRIDGES consultant.